Each year, the Nobel Prizes in the sciences highlight humanity’s most profound advances in understanding nature and ourselves. The 2025 laureates in medicine, physics, and chemistry have pushed the boundaries of knowledge in three realms—the living body, the quantum world, and the architecture of matter. Their discoveries reveal how life maintains harmony within, how quantum laws shape even macroscopic reality, and how we can design materials that defy chaos itself. Together, they tell a story of curiosity, creativity, and the enduring human quest to uncover order in complexity.

These explanations are written in a clear, narrative style that connects scientific detail with human curiosity. Each story follows the path from problem to discovery, showing not only what the scientists achieved, but also how their insights reshaped our understanding of nature. The goal is to make complex ideas accessible without oversimplifying their depth—to reveal the beauty of science through storytelling.

Peacemakers in Our Blood

The Story of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the Discovery of the Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 2025 was awarded to Mary E. Brunkow, Fred Ramsdell, and Shimon Sakaguchi for their groundbreaking discoveries explaining how our immune system, a powerful defender against infections, restrains itself from attacking the body’s own tissues. Their work revealed the existence and function of key cells that act as peacemakers within the body, as well as the gene that serves as their main control switch. These discoveries not only solved one of the central mysteries of immunology but also opened the door to entirely new ways of treating some of today’s most challenging diseases, from cancer to autoimmune disorders.

Our immune system is an evolutionary masterpiece that protects us daily from thousands of different microbes. Its astonishing ability lies in distinguishing foreign invaders from the body’s own healthy cells. This process, known as immune tolerance, begins largely in the thymus gland, where T cells—the key players in immune responses—are tested. Those that react too strongly to the body’s own proteins are destroyed in a process called central tolerance. Yet this safety check is not perfect, as some potentially dangerous self-reactive cells escape. This long puzzled scientists and suggested that an additional, peripheral control mechanism must exist within the body.

Shimon Sakaguchi approached the problem at a time when research on so-called suppressor T cells—thought to inhibit immune responses—had been largely abandoned due to misleading conclusions and a lack of solid evidence. Despite this, Sakaguchi persisted, inspired by earlier experiments showing that surgical removal of the thymus in three-day-old mice did not weaken their immune system but instead triggered a devastating attack on their own organs. He hypothesized that within mature T cells there exists a special population acting as a safeguard.

In a landmark study published in The Journal of Immunology in 1995, he used cellular markers to confirm his hypothesis. He isolated a subgroup of T cells (CD4+) and demonstrated that within it was a smaller subset expressing an additional surface marker, CD25. When he injected T cells lacking this CD4+CD25+ population into mice without a functioning immune system, the animals developed severe autoimmune diseases. However, when these cells were included, the mice remained healthy. This provided irrefutable evidence for the existence of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which actively maintain peace within the body.

Independently of the work taking place in Japan, Mary E. Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell in the United States were solving the puzzle from a different perspective. They came into possession of a strain of mice known as scurfy, which had accidentally appeared in the 1940s in a laboratory at Oak Ridge during radiation studies conducted as part of the Manhattan Project. Because of a spontaneous genetic mutation, these mice suffered from a fatal autoimmune disease that affected only males, indicating a defect on the X chromosome. In the 1990s, when the tools of molecular biology were still in their infancy, the two scientists set out to find a single incorrect letter in the sequence of 170 million base pairs that make up the mouse X chromosome.

After years of dedicated work, they managed to narrow the search down to about 500,000 base pairs containing twenty potential genes. It was only in the very last one—the twentieth gene—that they found the error: an insertion of two extra letters in the sequence of a previously unknown gene, which they named Foxp3. To confirm their discovery, they inserted a healthy copy of the gene into the genome of scurfy mice, which completely protected the animals from the disease. Soon afterward, in collaboration with pediatricians from around the world, they demonstrated that mutations in the human version of this gene, FOXP3, cause a rare but deadly autoimmune disorder in boys known as IPEX syndrome.

With these findings, two key pillars were established—soon united by science into a coherent whole. Sakaguchi’s team quickly discovered that the Foxp3 gene is expressed almost exclusively in the regulatory T cells he had identified. Moreover, they showed that by artificially introducing Foxp3 into ordinary T cells, these could be converted into fully functional regulatory T cells. It thus became clear that Foxp3 was not just another gene among many, but a “master switch” or transcription factor directing the entire development and activity of these vital peacemakers of the immune system. The absence of a single type of cell, controlled by a single gene, is enough to unleash a devastating autoimmune response.

The work of this year’s laureates has provided science with molecular tools to finely tune the immune system, opening the way to new, targeted therapies. In cancer treatment, the aim is to suppress or eliminate regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment, since cancer cells often exploit them for self-protection. In autoimmune diseases and organ transplantation, the goal is the opposite: to increase the number or enhance the function of regulatory T cells to calm unwanted immune reactions. Various strategies are already being tested in clinical trials—from administering substances that stimulate the growth of these cells to genetic engineering approaches that equip them with an “address” so they can find and protect a specific organ.

Shimon Sakaguchi, born in 1951, is a professor at Osaka University in Japan. Mary E. Brunkow, born in 1961, is a senior program manager at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, USA. Fred Ramsdell, born in 1960, serves as a scientific advisor at Sonoma Biotherapeutics in San Francisco, USA.

For younger readers, here’s a simple explanation of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine:

Imagine your body as a big city. Inside it lives an army of tiny guards. This army is called the immune system. Their job is to protect you all the time and chase away invaders like viruses and bacteria.

But sometimes, some guards get too eager. They want so badly to defend the body that they might accidentally attack its own healthy parts. This can cause problems and make you sick.

Scientists discovered that among these guards are also special supervisors. These are cells with a very specific job—to watch over the other guards and make sure they behave properly.

When they see a guard about to attack something that belongs to the body, they stop it and prevent the attack. In this way, they make sure the immune system works correctly and doesn’t cause harm.

But for these supervisors to exist, they need a special construction plan. This plan is written inside our bodies, in something called the Foxp3 gene. It’s the instruction that tells how an ordinary guard can become an effective supervisor. If there’s a mistake in this plan, the supervisors can’t develop properly, and the guards might start causing damage.

Three scientists—Mary, Fred, and Shimon—discovered these supervisors and their special blueprint. Their discovery is very important because it helps doctors find new ways to treat diseases. Now they can try to increase the number of supervisors to calm down an overactive immune system, or turn them off so the guards can fight harder against serious illnesses like cancer.

Jumping Through a Wall

The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics for the Discovery of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Energy Quantization in an Electric Circuit

Imagine throwing a ball at a wall. Naturally, you expect it to bounce back every time. That’s the world as we know it—the realm of “ordinary” classical physics that governs our everyday experience. Now imagine that, every once in a while, the ball would simply vanish on one side of the wall and appear on the other, without ever breaking through it. It sounds like science fiction, yet phenomena exactly like this occur in the microscopic world and are described by quantum mechanics. This strange effect is called tunneling.

The Nobel Prize in Physics for 2025 was awarded to a trio of scientists—John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis—who demonstrated that this peculiar quantum “leap through a wall” can occur not just with a single particle, but with billions of them simultaneously, in a system large enough to hold in your hands.

It was a feat achieved in the mid-1980s at the University of California, Berkeley, by a team consisting of Professor John Clarke, postdoctoral researcher Michel Devoret, and doctoral student John Martinis. They built a special electrical circuit whose core was a so-called Josephson junction—two superconductors separated by an extremely thin insulating barrier. In superconductors, electrons pair up into what are known as Cooper pairs and begin to move in perfect synchrony, like a flawlessly coordinated dance troupe. Because of this, billions of pairs behave as a single, enormous “super-particle,” described by one wave function.

The researchers trapped this system in a state with no electrical voltage, as if it were stuck in a valley from which, according to the laws of classical physics, it could not escape. Then the impossible happened: the entire system, as a whole, “jumped” or tunneled through the energy barrier and produced a measurable voltage on the other side. This was the first clear evidence of macroscopic quantum tunneling.

But that wasn’t all. The team also showed that the system absorbed energy only in specific, discrete packets—or quanta—much like an atom does. The discovery was groundbreaking because it blurred the boundary between the microscopic world of atoms and our everyday, macroscopic reality. The experiment was even compared to the famous Schrödinger’s cat, since it created a large system that could be fully described by a single quantum equation.

The significance of this work extends far beyond a deeper understanding of nature. By demonstrating that quantum states can be controlled in a macroscopic circuit, the researchers opened the door to a new technological era. Josephson junctions became the building blocks of qubits—the fundamental units used in today’s quantum computers. The work of Clarke, Devoret, and Martinis not only unveiled one of the deepest mysteries of physics but also laid the foundation for a technological revolution whose full impact we have yet to see.

Hotels for Molecules

The 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the Development of Metal–Organic Frameworks and a New Era of Material Design

In nature, a fundamental law prevails: entropy—everything tends toward disorder. Molecules do not like to arrange themselves into perfect patterns; they prefer to intertwine into tangled, amorphous masses. That is why the idea of forcing them, through the strongest chemical bonds, to build ordered, crystalline structures was long considered unimaginable—almost heretical—by most chemists. They believed it simply couldn’t be done. Yet it was precisely this struggle against nature’s basic tendency that Omar Yaghi chose to take on, igniting a revolution that, together with Susumu Kitagawa and Richard Robson, earned him the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

Yaghi rejected the traditional approach, which he mockingly called “shake and bake”—a kind of chemistry done without a clear recipe. He dreamed instead of becoming a molecular architect, constructing with atoms as if they were LEGO bricks. After years of experimentation, he finally discovered how to outsmart entropy. He found the precise balance of temperature, pressure, and time that allowed molecules, as they formed, to settle and align into an ordered structure—without sacrificing the strength of the bonds holding them together. The result was metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), materials with astonishing properties. His groundbreaking creation, known as MOF-5, possessed such an enormous internal surface area that a single handful of it could cover an entire football field.

This victory over chaos was not Yaghi’s alone. It was built on the work of two other pioneers. Richard Robson was the first to even imagine such a structure when, back in 1989, he created the first—albeit fragile—framework. Susumu Kitagawa then breathed life into these frameworks. He developed the first truly stable versions and discovered that they could even be flexible—that they could “breathe” and dynamically respond to the molecules entering them.

Today, these materials are already helping to solve some of humanity’s greatest challenges. In arid regions of the world, such as California’s Death Valley, they are being used to harvest clean drinking water directly from the air, with some devices requiring nothing more than sunlight to operate. On an industrial scale, hundreds of tons of these materials are used in cement plants to capture carbon dioxide from smokestacks, preventing it from entering the atmosphere. Other variants purify water of harmful chemicals such as PFAS, store hydrogen as a fuel, and even deliver medicines directly to cancer cells.

But the revolution is far from over. Yaghi now leads an institute where he combines the power of artificial intelligence with molecular architecture to accelerate the discovery of new materials for combating climate change. His ultimate goal is to create materials that operate according to a predefined code—something akin to a DNA sequence. He dreams of a material that could be “programmed” with instructions to convert captured carbon dioxide into fuel or other useful substances.

The story of MOFs is, in essence, a story of how understanding and mastering the fundamental laws of nature has given humanity the tools to build a better future.

Translated from the Slovene original, available here: kvarkadabra.net.

Subscribe now

More than half a century ago, Phil A. Silva conceived a study that changed our understanding of human development. In 1972, in the southern New Zealand city of Dunedin, he began an ambitious research project that included every child born in the city over the course of a single year. He probably did not imagine at the time that he was laying the foundations for one of the most influential, thorough, and long-lasting studies ever conducted on a large group of people.

The Dunedin Longitudinal Study soon proved to be a real treasure trove of knowledge. The original plan to follow the children until the age of three was expanded. Researchers began inviting participants back for detailed examinations every few years. Over time, the laboratories accumulated an enormous amount of data, covering everything from mental and physical health to personality traits, social relationships, financial circumstances, and even genetic predispositions.

Over time, the researchers began to discern complex patterns and connections within this vast body of information, revealing links that no one had ever noticed before. More than 1,400 scientific papers have been published so far, many of which have become key references in psychology, medicine, sociology, criminology, genetics, and public health.

The first findings already pointed to an unexpectedly large proportion of three-year-olds with developmental and behavioral difficulties. It also became clear that mental health problems often begin in childhood. Another surprising discovery was that a large share of people experience at least one period of mental distress by the time they reach middle age.

The study also greatly strengthened our understanding of the close connection between mental and physical health. Long-term data showed that poor mental health affects more than just one’s current well-being; it can also lead to poorer physical health and even accelerated biological aging. People with long-standing mental health problems were often in worse physical condition by middle age and showed signs of faster wear and tear of bodily systems. The reverse is also true: chronic physical illnesses or inflammatory processes can negatively affect mental well-being.

These findings highlight the importance of integrating mental health care into general health systems for the entire population, since temporary episodes of psychological distress are more the rule than the exception. The researchers also discovered that people age at remarkably different rates — differences in biological age among individuals born in the same year can be surprisingly large, revealing the influence of lifestyle, environment, and genetic factors on the aging process.

One of the most striking and widely discussed findings of the Dunedin Study concerns the influence of personality traits, especially self-control, on the course of a person’s life. The researchers found that individuals who, already as children, had difficulty regulating their impulses, persisting with tasks, and thinking prudently tended to face far greater difficulties as adults. Children with lower levels of self-control were later in life more likely to experience poorer physical health (such as obesity, high blood pressure, or frequent infections), various forms of addiction (including smoking, alcohol, or drug use), financial problems (debt, lack of savings), and criminal behavior. Even when intelligence and social background were taken into account, self-control remained an exceptionally strong predictor of life success.

A groundbreaking study published by Terrie Moffitt and Avshalom Caspi, who joined the research team in the 1990s, provided evidence that self-control can be strengthened. Children who improved their ability to regulate themselves as they grew up achieved better outcomes than their initial assessments would have predicted. This carries an important message: investing in the development of self-control skills during childhood can be highly beneficial, both for individuals and for society as a whole.

In the 1990s, the research team also began exploring genetics. They discovered that certain genetic variants, such as those in the MAO-A gene, can increase the risk of violent behavior, but only among individuals who experienced severe abuse or maltreatment in childhood. These findings highlighted the importance of the interaction between genes and environment and encouraged discussions on preventive measures to protect children from traumatic experiences.

One of the greatest strengths and defining features of the Dunedin Study is its exceptionally high level of participant engagement. Even after fifty years, nearly 94 percent of the original members remain active in the research, which is remarkable compared to other long-term studies that typically struggle with high dropout rates. The key to this extraordinary commitment lies in the trust and strong bond that has developed between participants and researchers. The team consistently emphasizes that the participants are the true heroes of the study, as they continue to respond to invitations for extensive and sometimes exhausting assessments, believing that their involvement contributes to knowledge that will benefit future generations. Researchers even visit them while they are serving prison sentences, and some participants see their continued involvement in the study as their main contribution to society.

The team is now preparing for a new round of assessments at the age of 52. They plan to use the latest tools, including whole-genome sequencing and gut microbiome analysis. The careful, decades-long tracking of an entire generation of Dunedin residents provides an invaluable source of data for science and a solid foundation for designing compassionate and equitable health and social policies around the world.

Translated from the Slovene original, available here: Življenja pod drobnogledom znanosti.

Subscribe now

Running may seem like one of the simplest forms of movement. You put on sportswear, lace up your running shoes, and head out. Moving your legs and breathing rhythmically feels completely natural, almost self-evident. Yet behind the scenes something much more intricate is taking place. With every step, the body responds with a series of precisely coordinated processes: the lungs increase the exchange of oxygen, which passes into the blood; the heart pumps this oxygen-rich blood more rapidly throughout the body; the muscles use the oxygen to produce energy; and the nervous system coordinates millions of signals. What we experience as simple bodily motion is in fact a highly complex physiological process.

In this essay, we will explain what happens inside the body during running and how these changes are reflected in the numbers tracked by a smartwatch: heart rate, energy expenditure, or the estimated VO₂max. Once a runner understands the background of these measurements, a clearer picture emerges of why training strengthens the body and how regular practice gradually improves performance.

How the Body Produces Energy for Running

The moment we start running, countless tiny machines inside our muscle fibers switch on at once. Each of them functions like a microscopic motor that needs energy to do its work. Without energy, the motor stops—along with the contraction of muscle fibers that makes bodily movement possible.

The sole “fuel” for these motors is the molecule ATP (adenosine triphosphate). The simplest way to imagine it is as a very small battery. The name “triphosphate” means that the molecule carries three phosphate groups. When one of them breaks off and releases energy, what remains is only a “diphosphate” with two phosphates. ADP (adenosine diphosphate) represents the empty battery.

There are many such “batteries” in the body, but still only enough for a few seconds of intense physical activity. If muscles relied solely on this initial stock of energy, bodily movement would quickly come to a halt. That’s why a system exists for continuously recharging these energy carriers. When the molecular “battery” runs down and ATP turns into ADP, special cellular processes immediately begin refilling it back into ATP. Without this “recycling,” running would last only a moment; with constant recharging, however, we can keep running far longer.

The most important contributors to this steady “recharging” are the mitochondria (often called the cell’s power plants). Inside them, a multitude of reactions transform energy from food—primarily carbohydrates and fats—into ATP. Mitochondria continuously generate ATP from nutrients so that muscle fibers never run out of energy.

Thus every step in running is not just a mechanical movement, but the outcome of a carefully coordinated process: muscle fibers consume ATP molecules, mitochondria recharge them, and the body works constantly to keep the supply of nutrients and oxygen sufficient. It is precisely this ability to renew energy on the go that enables humans to run even very long distances, depending on how efficiently and harmoniously these tiny machines in the body perform their work.

Different Energy Sources for Different Running Challenges

Inside the body, various energy systems are constantly at work to ensure that muscles have fuel in the form of ATP molecules. These systems never operate entirely in isolation; all are always active, but the share of their contribution shifts depending on the duration and intensity of running. Through training, the body gradually adjusts the thresholds that determine when one system takes priority over another, thereby improving endurance.

In the very first moments when a runner launches forward from rest, the fastest yet most limited energy source kicks in. This is the phosphocreatine system, also known as the ATP-PCr system. It operates without oxygen—hence it is called anaerobic—and functions like a backup generator that switches on under maximum strain. Muscles store a special molecule called phosphocreatine (PCr). Its role is simple: when an ATP “battery” runs down and only ADP remains, phosphocreatine instantly donates its phosphate group, converting ADP back into ATP. In this way the battery is quickly recharged, and the muscle can continue working at very high intensity without movement stopping.

This system is extremely fast and delivers an explosive burst of power—the very thing a runner needs for those first decisive steps when pushing off. It is most evident in 100- and 200-meter sprints. But it also has a limitation: the store of phosphocreatine is very small. After less than ten seconds of intense activity, it is depleted, and the body must turn to other, more sustainable energy sources to keep running.

When the runner continues at a fast but submaximal pace, the next energy source comes into play more strongly: anaerobic glycolysis. This is the process by which muscle cells break down glucose. As a simple sugar, glucose provides a readily available fuel that the body can use almost immediately, which is why glycolysis allows for quick and efficient production of new ATP.

In the past, it was thought that anaerobic glycolysis switches on because oxygen supply cannot keep up with demand at high intensity. More recent findings suggest that the reason is not necessarily a lack of oxygen but rather what is called metabolic inertia. The processes in the mitochondria, where energy is generated with the help of oxygen, need some time to reach full potential. During this transitional phase, anaerobic glycolysis steps in rapidly to provide energy until the aerobic system takes over the main load.

But Quick Fuel Comes at a Price

When glucose is broken down without sufficient oxygen (under anaerobic conditions), lactate is also produced. For decades it was widely believed that lactate was the main culprit behind the burning sensation and fatigue in muscles. Today we know this is not entirely true: lactate is actually a valuable intermediate product that other cells can use as an additional fuel, while also helping shuttle hydrogen ions (H⁺) from muscle cells into the bloodstream. Rather than being just a “waste product,” it is a bridge that transfers energy to where it is most needed. Some lactate can also travel to the liver, where it is converted back into glucose through the so-called Cori cycle, circulating again as an extra energy source.

Anaerobic glycolysis can effectively power a runner at high intensities, typically for efforts lasting from about thirty seconds to two minutes. This time window corresponds to medium-length sprints or demanding intervals, when the body has not yet had time to fully engage slower but more sustainable aerobic mechanisms.

When running extends into a true endurance challenge, the oxidative system takes over as the main source of energy. It requires a continuous supply of oxygen and is therefore the most efficient energy provider during prolonged running.

Mitochondria in muscle cells act like tiny power plants. From food—mainly sugars and fats—they first generate a common “fuel” called acetyl-CoA: sugars reach it through glycolysis and pyruvate, fats through the sequential cleavage of carbon chains (β-oxidation). This fuel enters the citric acid cycle (also known as the Krebs cycle), where its carbon atoms are finally converted into carbon dioxide, while electrons are loaded onto special energy carriers (NADH and FADH₂)—as if small batteries were being charged.

These “batteries” then deliver their electrons to the respiratory chain in the inner mitochondrial membrane. There, the energy is transformed into a “pressure” of protons on one side of the membrane, while oxygen at the end of the chain accepts the electrons and is turned into water. As the protons flow back through the enzyme ATP synthase, it acts like a tiny turbine, rebuilding ATP from ADP.

Whereas anaerobic glycolysis generates only 2 ATP molecules from one molecule of glucose, the oxidative system produces as many as 30 to 32—about fifteen times more. That is why it can provide energy for virtually unlimited periods, as long as fuel reserves and oxygen remain available.

The Aerobic Advantage

If the first energy pathways are like short-term backup generators that quickly fail, the aerobic system is the main and most reliable energy source for long-distance running, providing a continuous supply of energy as long as oxygen and fuel reserves are available. This is the reason a runner can keep going for hours at a time, covering even dozens of kilometers.

The aerobic system switches on more slowly, but it has a crucial advantage: endurance and adaptability. At lower running intensities it draws most of its energy from fats, of which the body has large stores. When the pace increases and muscles need more energy in less time, carbohydrates take on a larger share. This very ability to shift between fuel sources allows the body to remain efficient under widely varying conditions—from an easy jog to a demanding endurance race.

During a run, the ATP–PCr system provides the explosive start; then, at high intensity for a short time, anaerobic glycolysis dominates; and for longer, endurance efforts, the oxidative system takes the lead. Each energy system thus has its role: from powerful takeoffs, through brief accelerations, to marathon endurance. Only their coordinated operation makes it possible for a person to run both fast and long.

Muscles and the liver also store glycogen, a concentrated form of glucose that serves as a readily accessible energy reserve. When intensity rises, the body breaks glycogen down into glucose, which quickly enters glycolysis to produce additional ATP. The amount of glycogen stored in muscles largely determines how long we can maintain high intensity.

The drop in performance known as “hitting the wall” is not necessarily the result of a complete depletion of glycogen stores. Newer findings show that fatigue occurs earlier due to a combination of factors: local glycogen depletion in the most heavily loaded muscle fibers, the influence of declining liver glycogen on the brain (central fatigue), and protective mechanisms by which the brain prevents complete exhaustion.

With regular endurance training, the body increases its glycogen storage capacity while also becoming more economical: at the same pace, it draws more energy from fats, preserving glycogen reserves for longer. In this way, training directly improves endurance by extending the time we can sustain demanding running speeds.

Understanding the Lactate Threshold

After the first minutes of running, when different energy systems are working at full tilt, a process begins in the body that for a long time was considered the main barrier to endurance. In the previous section we encountered glycolysis, the fast way of generating energy that produces the molecule lactate. For many years, lactate was thought to be responsible for the burning sensation in muscles and for exhaustion. Today we know that this is not the case. Lactate is not a waste product but a useful source of energy that the body continuously produces and uses. The easiest way to picture it is as a circulating fuel: when it forms in one muscle cell, the body can transport it to other cells—or even to the heart—where it is consumed as extra energy. In this way lactate acts as a portable form of fuel that the body constantly generates and at the same time uses.

Glycolysis is always switched on—the only question is what happens to its product, pyruvate. When physical activity is moderate, pyruvate smoothly enters the mitochondria, where it is broken down further in the presence of oxygen. But when a runner speeds up and the demand for ATP exceeds the current capacity of the mitochondria, some pyruvate remains outside and is converted into lactate. This is not a sign of system failure but a precise response of the body: glycolysis can continue producing ATP rapidly even when the aerobic “power plant” cannot keep up. Lactate here is not just a by-product but an important molecule that allows the process to go on and simultaneously serves as an additional fuel for other cells.

The lactate threshold is therefore not an enemy but a key turning point in the runner’s experience. The easiest way to imagine it is as a speed limit we know we cannot sustain for long. Below the threshold, the body removes all lactate as it appears and even uses it as extra fuel. Running below this threshold feels easy: breathing is still relaxed, conversation flows effortlessly. But as the pace increases, there comes a moment when talking becomes difficult, breathing deepens, and the muscles begin to “glow.” This is the sign that we have reached the lactate threshold—the point at which lactate accumulates faster than the body can process it.

Why then do we feel pain and fatigue if lactate is not to blame? Alongside its formation—and especially during the rapid breakdown of ATP in muscle fibers—hydrogen ions (H⁺) are produced, lowering the pH. These ions cause the acidity that disrupts normal muscle contraction, which we perceive as burning pain and rapidly rising fatigue. It is important to note that H⁺ are always formed, but at high intensity they are produced so quickly that the body cannot remove or neutralize them fast enough. The best way to picture this is like garbage collection: waste (H⁺) is always being generated, but if too much piles up at once, the trucks (buffering systems) cannot carry it away in time. In this process, lactate is not the problematic waste—it is actually part of the solution, since it binds some of the H⁺ and helps transport them into the blood, where they can be more easily processed. The drop in pH at high intensity is therefore primarily a result of the rapid hydrolysis of ATP (the chemical breakdown of the “energy battery” that releases energy), while lactate acts more like a “buffer” and at the same time an additional fuel.

Nevertheless, a raised lactate threshold is one of the key markers of progress. With regular, targeted training this threshold shifts to higher running speeds. The body learns to work more economically: muscles become better at consuming lactate, oxygen transport improves, and energy use becomes more efficient. The result? A runner can run faster at the same heart rate without excessive accumulation of hydrogen ions. That means less acidity, less fatigue, and greater endurance.

Modern smartwatches and apps can even estimate, based on heart rate and running pace, where a runner’s lactate threshold lies. This allows for smarter training: running fast enough to challenge the body but not so fast that fatigue stops us too soon. Training around the threshold is in fact one of the most effective ways for runners to improve gradually and push their limits.

It is also worth noting that scientific literature distinguishes between two different lactate-related thresholds. The first (the aerobic threshold) is the point at which lactate in the blood begins to rise above baseline but the body can still successfully remove and use it. This is the highest intensity at which you are still running in the easy zone. The second (the anaerobic threshold) is the level at which lactate starts to accumulate faster than the body can clear it. This is the threshold that marks the transition into the zone of high intensity. Understanding these two thresholds helps runners pace themselves more effectively and train right at the edge where improvement is greatest.

The Number That Reveals Running Potential

With regular training, a runner notices that at the same pace their heart rate drops, breathing becomes calmer, and the feeling of effort decreases. All of this is reflected in a single key indicator recorded by modern smartwatches, somewhat complicatedly called VO₂max. The simplest way to picture it is like the engine size of a car: the bigger it is, the more fuel and air it can take in and the more power it produces. Similarly, a higher VO₂max means the body can use more oxygen and generate more energy.

Physiologically, VO₂max is the maximum amount of oxygen the body can consume in one minute during intense exercise. It is usually expressed in milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute (ml/kg/min), which allows comparisons between individuals of different sizes. It is one of the most reliable indicators of aerobic fitness and endurance.

Behind this single number stands a whole orchestra of bodily adaptations. The heart is the main engine: with regular training the left ventricle, which pumps blood into the body, enlarges. Each beat therefore becomes stronger, so the heart can pump more blood with each stroke and thus beat more slowly at rest. This is known as an increased stroke volume. The lungs act like precise gas exchangers: training improves their ability to transfer oxygen into the blood and remove carbon dioxide. At the same time, on the level of the muscles, the network of tiny capillaries expands, allowing for better oxygen delivery to cells. In healthy recreational runners, performance is usually more limited by cardiovascular delivery and peripheral oxygen use than by lung diffusion. Taken together, this means the body can deliver more oxygen to working muscles—and sustain their energy supply for longer.

The runner feels this directly. Because their “aerobic engine” is more efficient, they can run faster without immediately hitting the lactate threshold we discussed earlier. That is why monitoring VO₂max is not just a motivational number on a watch screen but evidence that the heart, lungs, and muscles are becoming more coordinated and powerful. It is important to remember, though, that modern smartwatches estimate VO₂max using algorithms, while the exact value can only be determined in a laboratory test. Estimates from watches are most reliable during longer, steady runs on flat terrain; hills, wind, altitude, and fatigue can distort the calculations. Still, the watch’s estimate is an excellent indicator of progress in running.

VO₂max values vary widely between people. In an average, untrained man around the age of thirty, it ranges from 40 to 45 ml/kg/min; in women, from 30 to 35 ml/kg/min. With regular, moderately intense training, these values can rise by 15 to 20 percent. At the other extreme, elite endurance athletes—marathoners, cross-country skiers, or cyclists—reach astonishing figures that exceed 80 ml/kg/min in men and 70 ml/kg/min in women. For perspective: top cyclists have estimated VO₂max values above 80, placing them among the very best in the world. Such achievements are not only a gift of genetics but also the result of decades of deliberate, specialized training.

It is also important to note that VO₂max gradually declines with age—after the age of 25, by an average of about 5–10 percent per decade. This is a natural part of aging, linked to changes in the heart and blood vessels. The good news is that regular physical activity greatly slows this decline. In other words: although age inevitably plays its part, training ensures that the aerobic engine can remain strong and reliable for a long time. Recreational marathoner Jeannie Rice, who runs marathons in just over three and a half hours, was measured at age 76 with a very high VO₂max (≈48 ml/kg/min; source)—the highest recorded for a woman over 75. That value is comparable to the VO₂max of a well-trained 25-year-old. Such examples show that with proper training, and likely favorable genetics, it is possible to maintain physical performance in later life at levels typical of people several decades younger.

Still, we must also keep in mind that two runners with the same VO₂max may run at different speeds due to differences in their running economy (how much oxygen an individual uses at a given speed) and their critical speed (the highest sustainable speed without progressive fatigue). VO₂max is therefore a very important measure of aerobic fitness, but not the only one. It reveals the size of our aerobic engine, but how fast and how far we can run also depends on how efficient that engine is and how we use it.

Practical Tips for Running Training

Understanding how the body works allows us to plan training more effectively. Instead of always running at the same pace, we can divide workouts into three key zones, each targeting different physiological systems. The largest portion of training should be dedicated to easy runs, when you can still chat comfortably. In this zone the body primarily uses fat for energy, while over time we build our basic endurance and strengthen the cardiovascular system.

When we want to improve speed, we include runs around the lactate threshold. These are longer segments at higher intensity, where talking becomes difficult and we begin to feel the onset of a burning sensation in the muscles. The goal of these runs is to shift the threshold upward, so that in the future we can maintain faster paces with less effort.

For developing maximum speed and power, interval runs are key. These are very short, high-intensity bursts that the body can sustain only for a few seconds to a few minutes. They help improve our maximal aerobic capacity, as reflected in VO₂max. Each of these three zones targets a different energy system, but together they form the complete picture—systems that the body continuously intertwines and coordinates during running.

Listen to Your Body with the Help of Technology

When we look into the physiology of running, it becomes clear that every step is not just a mechanical movement but part of a carefully coordinated process. The body knows how to switch between different energy sources, adapt to stress on the fly, and gradually strengthen through training—whether in a beginner or an experienced marathoner.

Modern technology is not just a timer or distance tracker but a tool that reveals what is happening inside the body. Metrics such as VO₂max or heart rate show the changes brought about by training: the heart grows stronger, the lungs become more efficient, and the muscles are better supplied with oxygen. If the heart rate is lower at the same pace, it means the body is doing the same work with less effort.

When runners understand these signals, they can more easily adapt their training—from fast intervals to slower long-distance runs. This approach brings not only progress but also greater safety and reduced risk of overuse injuries. The greatest advantage of understanding physiology, however, is that running becomes more than a sport: it turns into a healthy and lasting habit that supports the body over the long term. In the end, what matters in running is not only how fast we cover the kilometers, but also understanding why we are getting better with each passing day.

Source:

Kenney, William L., Jack H. Wilmore, and David L. Costill. Physiology of Sport and Exercise. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2020.

Subscribe now

Translated from the Slovene original, available here: Kaj se dogaja v telesu med tekom?

Professor Geoffrey Hinton was an unusually patient mentor. His graduate students, Ilya Sutskever and Alex Krizhevsky, spent countless hours experimenting with neural networks, an approach few experts believed in at the time. Many would have accused them of wasting time with academic "tinkering," but Hinton sensed they were onto something groundbreaking.

Krizhevsky became so deeply absorbed in optimizing a model for automatic image recognition that his regular academic responsibilities began to suffer. Instead of discouraging him, Hinton made an unusual agreement: for every week Krizhevsky improved the neural network's performance by at least one percent, he could postpone submitting his coursework. Later, the professor fondly recalled this anecdote: "While avoiding writing his term paper, he probably conducted the most influential research of the century."

The results of this student project were indeed impressive. In 2012, the AlexNet neural network not only won the ImageNet competition for automated image recognition—it decisively swept the competition aside. This small research group from the University of Toronto provided compelling practical proof that deep learning with large neural networks was the most promising path forward for artificial intelligence, sparking a revolution. It was a pivotal moment when neural networks moved from academia to the forefront of technological development. Computer companies quickly recognized the potential, and the entire field entered a phase of explosive growth.

Geoffrey Hinton comes from an extraordinary family of scientists and innovators. His great-great-grandfather was George Boole, the mathematician whose work laid the foundations for logic and computing. Another relative, surveyor and geographer George Everest, lent his name to the world's highest mountain. Despite being surrounded by exceptional scholars, Hinton’s academic path was far from straightforward. At the University of Cambridge, he explored various disciplines but struggled for a long time to find a topic that truly captivated him. He even dropped out briefly, taking casual jobs in London. His interests shifted from architecture to physics, chemistry, physiology, and philosophy before finally settling on a degree in experimental psychology.

A significant turning point in his intellectual journey came through conversations with philosopher Bernard Williams, who once remarked that different thoughts in the brain must correspond to different physical states, which is fundamentally different from computers, where software is independent of hardware. This was Hinton’s first exposure to an interdisciplinary approach intertwining neuroscience, mathematics, philosophy, and programming, ultimately guiding him toward developing artificial neural networks.

Historically, scientists have pursued artificial intelligence along two different paths. The symbolic approach was based on the idea that intelligence primarily involves logical reasoning. Advocates believed intelligence could be achieved by coding explicit rules for computers to solve problems. Geoffrey Hinton championed a different, biologically inspired approach, using artificial neural networks to mimic the workings of the human brain. These networks are complex mathematical models consisting of interconnected nodes (neurons) that learn from data by adjusting the weights of their connections.

Hinton firmly believed this method was more promising for achieving artificial intelligence because it closely mirrors the learning processes in the brain. One of his fundamental principles, believed applicable to the brain itself, was: "If you truly want to understand how something works, you must be able to recreate it artificially." Given the brain consists of neurons, deciphering the mechanism behind how these neurons store and process information became crucial for him.

Already in the 1970s, he dreamed of simulating neural networks on computers as a tool to study the human brain. But at that time, the idea was often dismissed in academic circles as eccentric, even naive. Most researchers doubted that simple connections between artificial neurons could lead to intelligence. His mentor even advised him to abandon this research direction to avoid seriously damaging his career.

Despite the skeptical academic environment, in the 1980s, Hinton and colleagues developed the backpropagation algorithm, enabling neural networks to learn from their mistakes by gradually adjusting connection weights between neurons. This was a crucial breakthrough, allowing neural networks to become significantly more effective at analyzing data. Hinton also contributed to developing Boltzmann machines, a type of neural network capable of independently identifying hidden patterns in data.

Hinton's persistent work gradually gained wider recognition, and in 2024 he received the Nobel Prize for his achievements in the development of neural networks. This further solidified his position as one of the most influential figures in the history of artificial intelligence and science in general. Reflecting on his career, he recently stated: "I would say I'm someone who doesn't really know what field he's working in but wants to understand how the brain works. And while attempting to understand how it functions, I helped create technology that works surprisingly well."

Subscribe now

In early March 2016, an extraordinary tournament took place in Seoul, South Korea, attracting millions of viewers worldwide. In a series of five matches of Go—one of the oldest and most complex strategy games—the world's top player at the time, Lee Sedol, competed against AlphaGo, a computer program developed by the company DeepMind. Before the tournament, experts confidently predicted an easy victory for the South Korean grandmaster, but it quickly became apparent they had severely underestimated AlphaGo.

The most dramatic moment of the tournament occurred on the second day. Lee Sedol had already lost the first match but remained determined to demonstrate his mastery in subsequent games. During the second match, he briefly stepped away from the playing hall for a short break to clear his mind. Meanwhile, AlphaGo played a move that forever changed the game of Go and is now considered one of the key milestones in artificial intelligence development.

On move 37, the program placed a stone unexpectedly on the fifth line, close to the edge of the board. Commentators fell momentarily silent before questioning if there had been an error. The move was so unconventional that no one anticipated it, as such moves simply were not part of the established repertoire of human masters.

Beyond Human Strategy: How AlphaGo Developed Novel Approaches

When Lee Sedol returned to the board, he stared at his computer opponent's unusual move in astonishment. He studied the board extensively, trying to grasp its significance. Initially, he could not understand AlphaGo's strategy, but soon he realized it was not a mistake but rather a brilliantly conceived plan. He recognized the strength of artificial intelligence, surpassing previous human comprehension of the game. Soon thereafter, he lost the second match as well. By the end of the tournament, he was greatly relieved to have managed at least one victory against the computer.

Move 37 became a symbol of a turning point in the relationship between artificial intelligence and humanity. AlphaGo did not base this remarkable move on analysis of historical human games. Instead, it developed the move independently through extensive self-play scenarios. The artificial intelligence played millions of matches against itself, experimenting with various approaches, and identified strategies through feedback that proved most successful. Thus, AlphaGo created entirely novel methods previously unknown to human players.

DeepMind and Demis Hassabis: From Games to Science

Demis Hassabis, the founder and head of DeepMind (now part of Google), had emphasized during the development of AlphaGo that programs like this represent just the first steps toward advanced artificial intelligence. As a youth, Hassabis was ranked second in the world in chess within his age group, providing him with deep insights into the significance of games as testing grounds for evaluating new artificial intelligence algorithms.

After returning from Korea, the DeepMind team embarked on a new, ambitious project. They decided to direct their AI expertise toward solving one of biology's greatest unsolved problems, which had puzzled scientists for decades. Similar to AlphaGo predicting moves in Go, they aimed to create AlphaFold—a program capable of predicting protein structures from amino acid sequences.

The Protein Folding Challenge: Biology's Grand Puzzle

Proteins can be thought of as miniature biological machines performing diverse, vital tasks within living organisms. For example, hemoglobin in blood binds and transports oxygen, insulin regulates glucose levels, and antibodies recognize and neutralize harmful invaders such as viruses and bacteria. Each protein's precise instructions are stored in the cell's genetic code within DNA molecules. These instructions determine the sequence of amino acids, linked together during synthesis much like beads on a necklace. The resulting amino acid chain spontaneously folds into a complex three-dimensional structure. This spatial form dictates the protein's function and its interactions with other molecules in biological processes.

For decades, predicting a protein’s three-dimensional structure from its amino acid sequence remained one of biochemistry's biggest mysteries. Solving this puzzle would allow scientists to precisely influence protein structure and function by strategically altering DNA. Such insight would open new avenues in medicine, biotechnology, and related sciences—from customized drug design to the creation of artificial enzymes with enhanced capabilities.

Revolutionary Results: AlphaFold Stuns the Scientific Community

In 2020, DeepMind presented an enhanced version of AlphaFold to the public. They tested their program in a new competition—this time not against human champions but in a contest of algorithms. The challenge was to determine the three-dimensional structures of proteins solely based on their amino acid sequences, using proteins whose structures were known to the competition organizers but not publicly disclosed.

AlphaFold's remarkable performance astonished the scientific community, similarly to AlphaGo’s achievement four years earlier. Its protein structure predictions matched experimental accuracy, representing a significant leap forward in molecular biology. Shortly thereafter, DeepMind used their new tool to determine structures for over 200 million proteins, making the entire dataset freely available to researchers worldwide.

In 2024, Demis Hassabis and John Jumper were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for developing this groundbreaking method of predicting protein structures from amino acid sequences. The research paper describing AlphaFold quickly became one of the most cited scientific publications of all time.

Subscribe now

The establishment of the University of Ljubljana in 1919 coincided with one of the most significant intellectual migrations of the 20th century. As the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was laying the foundations for its first Slovenian-language university, waves of Russian scholars were seeking refuge from the upheaval of the Russian Revolution. This convergence of circumstances would profoundly shape the development of higher education in Slovenia and create an enduring legacy of academic excellence and cross-cultural exchange.

The University of Ljubljana, though building upon educational traditions stretching back to the 16th century, faced considerable challenges in its early years. The institution needed to establish itself as a center of learning while simultaneously developing appropriate academic terminology in the Slovenian language and building up its faculty across multiple disciplines. In this context, the arrival of experienced Russian scholars presented both an opportunity and a challenge for the fledgling institution.

The Russian émigré professors who found their way to Ljubljana represented various academic disciplines and brought with them not only deep expertise in their fields but also rich experience in university administration and research organization. Many had held prestigious positions at leading institutions such as the University of Kiev, the St. Petersburg Mining Institute, and other renowned centers of learning. Their arrival would help address critical staffing shortages while simultaneously enriching the intellectual environment of the new university.

The integration of these scholars into the University of Ljubljana was not without its complications. As foreigners in a new academic environment, they faced multiple challenges: the need to learn a new language, adapt to different academic traditions, and establish their credibility in a new setting. Yet their presence would prove transformative, introducing new methodologies, research approaches, and academic standards that would help shape the university's development for decades to come.

The Political and Social Context: A Time of Transformation

The arrival of Russian scholars at the University of Ljubljana occurred during a period of profound change in both Slovenia and the broader European context. The dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire following World War I had created new possibilities for Slovenian cultural and academic development within the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. For the first time in history Slovenians had the opportunity to establish their own university, marking a crucial step in their national and cultural development.

The university began with just four complete faculties - Law, Philosophy, Technical Sciences, and Theology - along with an incomplete Medical Faculty. With only 18 professors at its founding, the institution faced a pressing need for qualified academic staff. This staffing challenge coincided with the arrival of Russian scholars fleeing the aftermath of the October Revolution and subsequent civil war, among them numerous distinguished academics and scientists.

The university's response to these émigré scholars was pragmatic but careful. While Russian professors were welcomed, particularly in fields where local expertise was lacking, they were initially hired on temporary contracts rather than permanent positions. This arrangement reflected both the university's immediate needs and the uncertain political climate of the time. The acquisition of Yugoslav citizenship became a crucial step for these scholars, as it was often a prerequisite for permanent academic positions and administrative roles.

The distribution of Russian scholars across the university's faculties was not uniform. The Technical Faculty, in particular, benefited from their expertise, with Russian professors comprising up to 21.7% of its teaching staff by 1929. This concentration reflected both the strength of Russian technical education and the particular needs of the Ljubljana faculty. Similar patterns were observed at the University of Belgrade, where Russian professors made up significant percentages of faculty in technical and agricultural sciences.

Personal Narratives: Resilience and Adaptation

The story of Russian professors at the University of Ljubljana is not merely one of academic achievements and institutional development. Behind the formal records lie fascinating personal narratives of adaptation, resilience, and sometimes surprising turns of fate. Some of their stories offer glimpses into the human experience of intellectual migration during one of Europe's most turbulent periods.

One of the most poignant stories is that of Professor Ignacij Nikolajevič von Majdel, whose journey epitomized the remarkable adaptability of the Russian émigré scholars. A former decorated general-lieutenant in the Russian army, von Majdel had fought against the Bolsheviks before fleeing to Slovenia. In Ljubljana, he completely reinvented himself as a chemistry professor, channeling his disciplined precision into teaching chemical compounds and laboratory techniques. His military accolades, including the prestigious Order of St. Vladimir, were set aside as he dedicated himself to academia. Despite his significant contributions, his time at the university was tragically short; he passed away in 1930 after only a few years of service. In a gesture of respect, the university allocated his final salary to his widow for funeral expenses.

Nikolaj Preobraženski's story contains endearing details that his students never forgot. Known for always carrying candies for female students, he never gave negative grades. His love for fish, acquired in his riverside hometown, led to the amusing sight of fish tails frequently protruding from his briefcase as he walked Ljubljana's streets. Preobrazhensky also faced significant challenges in his academic career at the University of Ljubljana. Despite his expertise in Slavic history and linguistics, he was rejected for habilitation six times before finally succeeding in 1958, after first obtaining the position in Zadar. For nearly four decades, he worked as a lecturer in Russian language, contributing to education and cultural exchange, yet struggled to secure recognition within the academic hierarchy.

The story of Aleksej Kopylov and his career trajectory is particularly interesting. He came to Ljubljana in the 1920s and continued teaching until he was 79 years old, well into the 1950s. What makes his story unique is that he was one of the few Russian professors who successfully transitioned through WWII and the establishment of the communist regime. His expertise in designing watertight mine doors proved so valuable to Yugoslavia's industrial development that the new authorities kept him on despite his émigré background. He and his wife, though childless, lived in a large house in Rožna dolina which they ultimately donated to the University of Ljubljana.

There was a remarkable partnership of Evgen Kansky and his wife Ana (née Mayer). He arrived as a Russian émigré scientist; she became the first woman to receive a doctorate from the University of Ljubljana. Together, they embodied the potential for cross-cultural collaboration in both academic and practical pursuits. She founded the company Dr. A. Kansky – Chemical Factory, which became synonymous with high-quality chemical products. It was Yugoslavia's first factory for producing sulfuric ether, anesthetic ether, and industrial solvents in Podgrad near Zalog, laying the foundations for Slovenia's modern chemical and pharmaceutical industries.

Evgen played a pivotal role in advancing medical research at the University of Ljubljana. He founded the Institute of Physiology, which began with just two modest rooms for student exercises and a chemical laboratory but grew into a hub for groundbreaking research in physiological chemistry. His dual expertise in chemistry and medicine allowed him to pioneer innovative approaches to biochemical research. As dean of the Medical Faculty for multiple terms, he introduced lasting standards and practices that profoundly shaped medical education in Slovenia.

Their story took a dramatic turn during World War II. The Kansky factory was seized by German forces and later nationalized by the postwar Yugoslav government in May 1948. After losing her company, Ana withdrew from public life and passed away in 1962. Evgen, forced into early retirement from his professorship in 1945 at the age of fifty-eight, lived until 1977, passing away at the age of ninety. Despite these setbacks, their legacy in academia and industry endures as a testament to their resilience and contributions.

Academic Contributions Across Disciplines

Alexander Dimitrijevič Bilimovič exemplified the depth and diversity of expertise brought by Russian émigré scholars to Ljubljana. Known for always appearing at lectures in a formal frock coat, he symbolized the enduring academic rigor and dignity he carried from his distinguished past. Before fleeing Russia, Bilimovič had served as a minister in the anti-Bolshevik government and held academic positions at prominent Russian universities. In Ljubljana, he reinvented himself as a professor of economics, quickly gaining the admiration of his students. His ability to distill complex economic theories into clear, understandable concepts was legendary—his lectures were so popular that students often crowded two to a bench.

Bilimovič’s courses emphasized the history of economic thought, theoretical economics, and controversial topics such as planned economies, reflecting his focus on broad theoretical frameworks rather than local economic issues. He engaged in correspondence with Friedrich Hayek, with whom he discussed matters of economic theory and policy, further demonstrating his connection to the international intellectual community. Despite his disinterest in the specifics of Yugoslav economic challenges, his work brought significant academic prestige to the university. Through his teaching and international engagement, Bilimovič helped establish economics as a rigorous academic discipline, leaving a legacy of intellectual influence that extended well beyond Slovenia.

Mikhail Nikitič Jasinski brought new perspectives to legal history through his detailed analysis of medieval legal documents. His work on the Kastav Statute proved groundbreaking, illuminating the transition from oral customary law to written legal codes in the South Slavic region. Jasinski's research methodology, combining careful textual analysis with broader historical context, introduced new standards of legal historical scholarship to the faculty.

Alexander Vasiljevič Maklecov made perhaps the most innovative contributions in the field of criminal law and criminology. Breaking with traditional approaches that focused solely on legal doctrine, Maklecov introduced sociological perspectives to the study of criminal behavior. His work on juvenile delinquency and criminal psychology brought new dimensions to legal education in Ljubljana. By 1934, he had helped establish a comprehensive system of criminal law study that combined theoretical understanding with practical applications.

Transforming Technical Education and Applied Sciences

The Technical Faculty particularly benefited from the arrival of Russian émigré professors, who brought with them not only theoretical knowledge but also practical experience from Russia's well-established technical institutes. Their influence was profound, as they helped develop both the educational framework and research capabilities of the faculty during its crucial early years.

Dmitry Vladimirovič Frost emerged as a key figure in mining engineering and geophysics. Having previously served at the prestigious Mining Institute in Saint Petersburg, Frost brought sophisticated approaches to mine surveying and geological exploration. He introduced new methodologies for magnetic ore prospecting and geophysical exploration. These contributions were particularly valuable for Slovenia's mining industry, which was seeking to modernize its operations in the interwar period. Known as a quiet, serious, and modest man, he lived on Bleiweisova Street 16 and devoted himself entirely to his work. Despite his distinguished background, he adapted to the more modest conditions in Ljubljana without complaint.

Vasilij Vasiljevič Nikitin's contributions to mineralogy and petrography proved equally transformative. As a former director of the Saint Petersburg Mining Institute, Nikitin brought unparalleled expertise to Ljubljana. His research methodologies, particularly in crystallography, set new standards for geological studies in Slovenia. But despite being a world-renowned mineralogist, he struggled to secure a permanent position due to bureaucratic age restrictions. Yet he continued teaching well into his 70s out of dedication to his field and students. He was known for having a flower in his buttonhole every day, summer and winter, grown in his own garden.

One particularly telling detail comes from Professor Nikitin's interaction with a young female scientist, Ljudmila Mantuani Dolar. When she became a private docent in 1937, Nikitin, despite his own precarious position, tried to help her by sharing some of his teaching load so she could earn additional income. This gesture of collegiality met with resistance from students who wanted to continue studying with Nikitin, showing the complex dynamics at play in the university community.

The technical expertise these professors brought was particularly valuable because it bridged theoretical knowledge with practical applications. For instance, Fjodor Fjodorovič Grudinski, who taught mechanical engineering, developed comprehensive courses that combined mathematical precision with practical problem-solving. His approach to teaching differential equations and analytical geometry emphasized their applications in engineering, helping students understand both theoretical principles and their practical implementation.

The Russian professors also played a crucial role in establishing and equipping new laboratories and research facilities. Despite limited resources, they managed to create functional research spaces that allowed for both teaching and experimental work. Their experience in organizing and managing technical institutes in Russia proved invaluable in this regard. For example, when Nikitin took charge of the mineralogy laboratory, he implemented efficient systems for specimen cataloging and analysis that would serve the institution for decades to come.

A particularly notable aspect of their contribution was their role in developing technical terminology in Slovenian. Many technical concepts needed to be expressed in Slovenian for the first time, and these professors worked closely with their Slovenian colleagues to develop appropriate technical vocabulary. This linguistic contribution, though less visible than their research work, proved crucial for the development of technical education in Slovenia.

The impact of these professors extended beyond the university through their involvement in practical engineering projects. Vasilij Nikitin's surveys identified key mineral deposits, directly aiding mining operations and resource management, while Dmitrij Vladimirovič Frost trained engineers who led projects in road, bridge, and industrial facility construction. Hydraulic engineer Sergej Maksimov contributed to water management systems, including irrigation and flood control, boosting agricultural productivity. Their expertise influenced urban planning, industrial design, and public infrastructure, and their technical training equipped local professionals with skills for modernizing Slovenia’s economy. Acting as advisors to state-led projects, they ensured adherence to contemporary scientific and engineering standards, leaving a lasting legacy on Slovenia’s industrial landscape.

Building Academic Culture and Social Integration

The impact of Russian émigré professors extended far beyond their formal teaching and research duties. These scholars played a crucial role in shaping the academic culture at the University of Ljubljana during its formative years, while simultaneously navigating the challenges of integration into Slovenian society.

The development of academic standards and practices was perhaps their most enduring contribution. Many of these professors had experienced the rigorous academic traditions of Russia's most prestigious institutions, and they worked to establish similar standards in Ljubljana. For example, Alexander Bilimovič's insistence on precise mathematical and statistical analysis in economics raised the bar for academic rigor across the faculty. Vasilij Nikitin, for instance, introduced sophisticated laboratory practices in mineralogy that he had developed at the St. Petersburg Mining Institute. These methodologies, adapted to local conditions and resources, helped establish research standards that would influence generations of scientists. His meticulous approach to documentation and experimental design became a model for other departments.

Language barriers presented another significant hurdle. Teaching complex academic subjects in a new language required extraordinary effort. These scholars approached this challenge with remarkable determination, many achieved sufficient proficiency to deliver lectures in Slovenian within their first year. Their commitment to mastering the language went beyond mere functionality - they needed to develop sophisticated academic vocabulary to convey complex concepts in their respective fields. This linguistic adaptation was particularly crucial in technical and scientific fields, where precise terminology was essential.

Social integration occurred on multiple levels. Many Russian professors became active members of the Russian Matica in Ljubljana, an organization that served as a cultural bridge between Russian émigrés and the local community. This organization, under the leadership of various Russian professors including Bilimovič and Spektorski, sponsored lectures, publications, and cultural events that enriched Ljubljana's intellectual life.

However, integration was not without its challenges. Some professors maintained strong ties to their Russian identity while adapting to their new environment. Spektorski's personal diaries reveal the complexity of this cultural negotiation, showing both appreciation for Slovenian intellectual life and occasional nostalgia for the grand academic traditions he had left behind. These personal struggles added depth to their academic contributions, informing their understanding of cultural exchange and adaptation.

Professional Challenges and Academic Achievements

The most immediate challenge these professors faced was the need to prove their academic credentials in a new system. Despite their distinguished careers in Russia, many found themselves having to demonstrate their qualifications anew. The case of Vasilij Nikitin particularly illustrates this challenge. Despite his international reputation in mineralogy and his former position as director of the St. Petersburg Mining Institute, he initially struggled to secure a permanent position in Ljubljana. The university administration, bound by civil service regulations, could not immediately grant him the status his expertise warranted.

The institutional framework of the University of Ljubljana presented its own challenges. As a new university establishing its procedures and traditions, it often lacked the administrative flexibility to accommodate experienced foreign scholars. The requirement for Yugoslav citizenship as a prerequisite for permanent positions created particular difficulties. This requirement meant that many Russian professors spent years working on temporary contracts, despite their valuable contributions to the university.

Yet within these constraints, the Russian professors achieved remarkable success. Their publications in international journals helped establish Ljubljana's reputation in the global academic community. Bilimovič's economic analyses were published in leading German and French journals, while Nikitin's mineralogical studies gained recognition across Europe.

Their academic achievements extended beyond research and teaching. Many took on important administrative roles, contributing to the university's development at an institutional level. Evgen Kansky, for instance, served multiple terms as dean of the Medical Faculty, where he shaped its curriculum, fostered research initiatives, and guided its growth during the formative years. Similarly, Aleksander Bilimovič served as dean of the Faculty of Law, introducing modern legal education frameworks and mentoring a new generation of Slovenian jurists. Their experience with established universities proved invaluable as Ljubljana developed its own administrative practices and academic traditions.

The Russian émigré professors played a pivotal role in shaping the early development of the University of Ljubljana. Their expertise addressed critical staffing shortages, while their methodologies and academic standards elevated the institution's quality of education and research. Beyond their professional contributions, they navigated linguistic and cultural challenges with adaptability, enriching both the academic environment and Slovenian society.

Sources

• Brglez, A., & Seljak, M. (2007). Ruski profesorji na Univerzi v Ljubljani. Inštitut za civilizacijo in kulturo.

• Oset, Ž. (2016). Rusi prihajajo! Ruski profesorji na tehniški fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani v obdobju Kraljevine SHS. Monitor ISH: Znanstvena revija za humanistiko in družbene vede, XVIII(1), 87–108.

• Brglez, A. (2015). Ruski znanstveniki v Kraljevini Jugoslaviji. Monitor ISH, 17(1), 151–176.

Subscribe now

In the early 20th century, when humanity was still grappling with the mysteries of flight and only beginning to understand the complexities of our planet, Herman Potočnik Noordung dared to look beyond Earth’s horizon. A Slovenian engineer and visionary thinker, Noordung imagined a future where humans would inhabit the stars.

Decades before the first human-made satellite orbited the Earth, he proposed groundbreaking ideas that laid the foundation for modern space exploration. Among his most notable concepts was the "Wohnrad," a wheel-shaped space station designed to generate artificial gravity—an idea that would inspire countless engineers, filmmakers, and scientists for generations to come.

What set Noordung apart was not merely his technical ingenuity but his holistic understanding of the human dimension of space travel. He envisioned sustainable living environments in space that addressed both the mechanics of survival and the psychological and physiological well-being of astronauts. His 1928 book, The Problem of Space Travel, stands as a seminal work, brimming with meticulous calculations, groundbreaking designs, and a vision that was as audacious as it was inspiring.

Early Life and Military Career

Herman Potočnik was born on December 22, 1892, in Pula, a vibrant naval hub of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Raised in a Slovenian family with deep military connections, he inherited a legacy of discipline and service. His father, Jožef Potočnik, served as a naval doctor, while his mother, Marija Kokoschinegg, hailed from a family with Czech roots, reflecting a multicultural heritage. Following his father’s untimely death in 1894, the family relocated to Maribor, where young Herman’s curiosity and intellect began to take shape during his formative years.

Potočnik attended a prestigious military school in Bad Fischau, near Vienna, where his aptitude for engineering began to shine. Guided by his uncle, a major-general in the Austro-Hungarian Army, he secured a place at the esteemed Imperial and Royal Technical Military Academy in Mödling. There, he excelled in railway and bridge construction, culminating in his graduation in 1913 with the rank of engineer second lieutenant, laying the groundwork for his future innovations.

During World War I, Potočnik applied his engineering expertise on the front lines, constructing and maintaining vital infrastructure, such as bridges and railways, for the Austro-Hungarian military. He faced the brutal realities of war in major battles, including the grueling campaigns on the Soča Front. These experiences profoundly affected him, both physically and emotionally, as the harsh conditions and prolonged exposure to disease ultimately led to his diagnosis with tuberculosis. Unable to continue his military service, he retired in 1919 with the rank of captain, marking the end of one chapter and the beginning of his path toward groundbreaking innovation.

Despite facing significant health challenges, Potočnik’s unwavering passion for engineering propelled him forward. After the war, he relocated to Vienna to live with his brother and resumed his studies at the Vienna University of Technology. By 1922, he had successfully earned both an engineering degree and a doctorate in electrical engineering. These academic milestones, combined with his profound wartime experiences, became the foundation for his pioneering contributions to astronautics.

The Seminal Work: The Problem of Space Travel

After earning his doctorate, Potočnik devoted himself wholeheartedly to the possibilities of space travel. His fragile health, which precluded traditional employment, became an unexpected advantage, allowing him to focus exclusively on his passion for astronautics. He delved deeply into the works of contemporary pioneers like Hermann Oberth and Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, absorbing their groundbreaking theories on rocketry and space exploration, which served as a vital foundation for developing his own revolutionary ideas.

By 1925, Potočnik embarked on crafting his vision for humanity’s long-term presence in space. Drawing on his engineering expertise and an extraordinary imagination, he devised innovative solutions to overcome the daunting challenges of living and working in the unforgiving environment of outer space. These efforts culminated in 1928 with the publication of his seminal work, Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums – Der Raketen-Motor (The Problem of Space Travel – The Rocket Motor), a book that would profoundly influence the future of astronautics.

Regarded as a cornerstone in the history of astronautics, his book stands as a visionary masterpiece. Written under the pseudonym Hermann Noordung, it outlined a bold and forward-thinking blueprint for space exploration, long before such ideas were feasible. Potočnik seamlessly fused rigorous engineering principles with an imaginative perspective, creating a work that was both technically groundbreaking and profoundly inspirational.

One of the most revolutionary proposals in the book was the "Wohnrad," a wheel-shaped space station ingeniously designed to generate artificial gravity. By rotating at a precise speed, the station would utilize centrifugal force to mimic gravity for its inhabitants. As Potočnik explained, "Artificial gravity created through rotation will allow humans to live and work in space as they do on Earth, maintaining both health and productivity." This groundbreaking design tackled the inherent challenges of weightlessness while also laying the foundation for a sustainable living environment in space.

Potočnik championed the principles of resource management and self-sufficiency as essential pillars for space exploration. "To sustain human life in space, a station must be entirely self-sufficient, with systems to recycle air and water and harness solar energy—a mirror of Earth's natural processes," he wrote. These forward-thinking concepts laid the foundation for modern sustainability practices in space, ensuring that future missions could thrive independently from Earth’s resources while minimizing environmental impact.

Decades ahead of his time, Potočnik envisioned satellites placed in geostationary orbit, remaining fixed relative to a point on Earth to facilitate continuous communication and observation. "Satellites fixed in orbit will serve as platforms for communication and observation, opening a new dimension in connecting humanity," he proposed. This visionary concept laid the groundwork for modern communication and weather satellites, which today are integral to global connectivity and forecasting, underscoring the profound foresight of his ideas.

The Legacy of Visionary Design

Herman Potočnik Noordung’s influence extends well beyond his lifetime, significantly shaping the trajectory of modern space exploration and design. One of his most notable admirers was Wernher von Braun, the visionary architect behind the Apollo moon missions, who recognized Potočnik’s concepts as pivotal. Among these, the idea of rotating space stations to generate artificial gravity stood out, becoming a foundational principle that continues to inform the design of future space habitats and exploration efforts.

The echoes of Noordung’s "Wohnrad" reverberate across popular culture and modern science. Stanley Kubrick’s iconic film 2001: A Space Odyssey prominently features a rotating space station strikingly similar to Potočnik’s design, cementing the cultural significance of his visionary ideas. Even today, cutting-edge space exploration projects, such as NASA’s Gateway lunar outpost, continue to integrate elements inspired by his groundbreaking concepts, highlighting their enduring relevance.

Beyond his engineering innovations, Potočnik also tackled the pressing challenges of human biology in space. He was a pioneer in recognizing the detrimental effects of microgravity on the human body, including muscle atrophy and bone density loss. To combat these issues, he emphasized, "The absence of gravity in space will weaken human muscles and bones unless counteracted by systematic physical exercise and innovative habitat designs." These groundbreaking ideas laid the foundational principles for the emerging field of space medicine, ensuring that human health remains a priority in the exploration of space.

Overlooked in His Lifetime

Despite the groundbreaking nature of his work, Herman Potočnik Noordung garnered little recognition during his lifetime. Choosing to publish under the pseudonym "Hermann Noordung," he sought to distinguish his intellectual contributions from his personal identity—a choice that may have inadvertently contributed to the limited reach of his ideas. Furthermore, the technological constraints of the 1920s made his visionary concepts appear impractical to many of his contemporaries. Combined with the political and economic instability of the interwar period, these factors significantly hindered the broader dissemination and acceptance of his groundbreaking work.

Potočnik’s health posed significant challenges, severely limiting his ability to advocate for his groundbreaking ideas. Stricken with tuberculosis and living modestly in Vienna, he lacked the financial resources and institutional support that could have amplified the reach of his work. Tragically, his untimely death in 1929 at the young age of 36 cut short a life brimming with extraordinary promise and unrealized potential.

It was only in the decades following his death that Herman Potočnik’s contributions began to receive the recognition they rightfully deserved. Rediscovery of his groundbreaking book led to its translation into multiple languages, enabling his visionary concepts to reach a global audience. Today, scholars of astronautics and space exploration widely acknowledge his pivotal role as a pioneer, highlighting his profound influence on both the theoretical and practical advancements in the field. In his homeland of Slovenia, his legacy is celebrated as a symbol of national pride, with institutions such as the Noordung Center in Vitanje committed to preserving and promoting his remarkable work.

Herman Potočnik Noordung was more than an engineer; he was a dreamer and a pioneer who dared to envision humanity’s future beyond the confines of Earth. As he eloquently expressed, "Space is not merely a void to traverse; it is a frontier that challenges the very limits of human ingenuity and perseverance." His ideas, though rooted in the scientific and technological limitations of his time, transcended those boundaries to inspire future generations of scientists, engineers, and space enthusiasts.

Subscribe now

In the early summer of 1914, as the world teetered on the brink of the First World War, a momentous technological achievement was taking shape in the heart of Togo, a German colony in Africa. After years of challenging construction, led by the brilliant engineer Anton Codelli, one of the most advanced and powerful radio stations of its time became operational.

This ambitious project, spanning kilometers and incorporating a power plant, living quarters, and administrative buildings, was not merely a marvel of engineering but also a strategic asset for the German Empire, designed to establish a global communication network independent of rival powers. With its colossal wire antenna supported by towering iron masts and massive concrete blocks, the station could transmit signals over 5,000 kilometers to Berlin and beyond, connecting other colonies and ships at sea.

On the eve of war, as tensions simmered between European powers, the race for global dominance extended beyond territories and resources to a new frontier: communication. At its core was a revolutionary technology—wireless telegraphy. Determined to challenge Britain's dominance through its vast undersea cable network, Germany embarked on a bold endeavor: the construction of the transcontinental Kamina radio station in its West African colony. This station was not only a technological marvel but also a symbol of Germany's aspirations for global power and its commitment to modernizing its colonial reach.

Rising from the dusty savanna, Kamina embodied Germany’s vision of global connectivity and its ambitions to project influence far and wide. Entrusted with this groundbreaking project was Anton Codelli, a baron from Ljubljana whose aristocratic heritage was matched by his engineering genius. Selected by the renowned German company Telefunken, Codelli took on the challenge of transforming an isolated colony into a hub of technological advancement.

Building Kamina Station in Togo

Between 1911 and 1914, Kamina’s construction in Togo—a remote colony in West Africa—posed monumental challenges that tested the limits of early 20th-century engineering and logistics. Harsh climates, rugged terrain, and the absence of supporting infrastructure required meticulous planning and ingenuity. Materials and prefabricated components were shipped from Germany and assembled on-site, overcoming significant logistical hurdles.

The strategic choice of Togo reflected Germany’s broader aspirations. Positioned as a central hub, Togo allowed Kamina to link Berlin with other German colonies and naval operations, integrating colonial outposts into a unified network. This vision of seamless communication underscored Germany’s imperial ambitions, enhancing military coordination and administrative efficiency across its territories.

Known for his innovative spirit, Anton Codelli transformed this isolated colony into a hub of technological advancement. Under his direction, Kamina emerged as a marvel of modern engineering, its towering masts and advanced transmitters symbolizing the dawn of global connectivity. Codelli’s leadership, combining scientific precision with creative problem-solving, was instrumental in overcoming logistical and technical challenges.

The station's scale was staggering. Anchored by reinforced concrete blocks, massive antenna masts were designed to withstand Togo’s intense weather conditions, including heavy rains and fierce winds. Advanced transmitters and receivers operated with unparalleled range and efficiency, making Kamina a vital node in Germany’s global communication strategy. The facility also included a centralized power plant, administrative buildings, and living quarters, meticulously planned to ensure functionality and support personnel.

However, Kamina’s construction was not without controversy. The use of forced labor, common in colonial projects, highlighted the exploitative practices of the era. Local workers endured grueling conditions, juxtaposed with the advanced technological infrastructure they helped create. Although Codelli reportedly treated laborers better than was typical for the time, the project remained a stark symbol of the inequities of colonial rule.

By mid-1914, Kamina stood completed—a towering testament to human ambition and ingenuity. Yet, as the shadow of war loomed, Kamina’s moment of triumph would be short-lived. The turbulence of World War I would soon challenge the resilience of both the station and the empire that built it.

Anton Codelli: The Baron from Ljubljana

Anton Codelli (1875-1954) was far more than just a nobleman with a fancy title (though he certainly had that - Anton Freiherr Codelli von Codellisberg, Sterngreif und Fahnenfeld!). He was a restless spirit, a born inventor who defied expectations and left his mark on everything from cars to communication.

Born in Naples to an aristocratic family with roots deep in Slovenian history, Codelli could have easily settled into a life of privilege. He spent his youth between Ljubljana and Vienna, attending the elite Theresianum boarding school, a breeding ground for future emperors and diplomats. But while his classmates pursued law or politics, Codelli was captivated by the burgeoning world of technology.

This fascination led him down an unconventional path. After a brief, unsatisfying stint in the Austro-Hungarian navy, he abandoned his law studies in Vienna to pursue engineering. This was a bold move for a young baron, a rejection of the traditional roles expected of his class. It spoke to his independent spirit and his drive to forge his own destiny.

Codelli's interests were as diverse as his talents. He is perhaps best known for bringing the first automobile to Ljubljana in 1898, a feat that earned him both admiration and suspicion. In the sleepy provincial town, Codelli's "devil's wagon" was initially met with fear and disapproval, as people were unnerved by its speed of around 20 km/h. But his true passion lay in pushing the boundaries of what was possible.

Around the turn of the century, he became captivated by the magic of radio. Collaborating with physicist Albin Belar, he built Ljubljana's first radio receiver, a device that could capture time signals broadcast from afar. He then turned his attention to the sea, developing a radiotelegraph system for the Austro-Hungarian navy, enabling ships in the Adriatic to communicate directly with command centers on the coast.

These early successes cemented Codelli's reputation as a gifted innovator. In 1911, his talents caught the eye of Telefunken, a leading German telecommunications company. They offered him a challenge that would define his legacy: to establish a long-wave radio link between Berlin and Togo, a German colony in Africa. This ambitious project, the Kamina radio station, would become a testament to Codelli's vision and engineering prowess.

Kamina in Operation

When Kamina became operational in 1914, it immediately demonstrated its groundbreaking capabilities. The station’s advanced wireless technology enabled transcontinental communication on an unprecedented scale. Messages were transmitted seamlessly between Berlin and Togo, traversing over 5,000 kilometers, while additional links connected Kamina to other German colonies and naval fleets stationed in distant seas.

The heart of Kamina’s operation was its massive transmitter system, powered by a cutting-edge generator capable of producing enough energy to drive the powerful signals. The station’s towering iron masts supported a complex web of antennas, which radiated messages across vast distances. Operators worked in meticulously designed control rooms, utilizing state-of-the-art equipment to ensure the clarity and reliability of transmissions.

Kamina played a dual role in communication. Militarily, it was a vital link for Germany’s colonial and naval operations. In the early days of World War I, the station transmitted critical strategic information between the German High Command and its forces in Africa and the Atlantic. Its ability to maintain uninterrupted communication offered a significant advantage, enabling swift coordination of military resources across vast territories.

On the civilian front, Kamina served as a hub for administrative communication, facilitating governance and trade within the German Empire’s colonial network. The station’s efficiency in relaying messages significantly reduced the time required for decisions and responses, streamlining colonial administration and reinforcing the integration of outposts into the broader imperial framework. In total, the station managed to transmit 229 messages between Germany and its colonies before it was demolished.

The Destruction of the Kamina Radio Station

The outbreak of World War I in the summer of 1914 drastically altered the fate of the Kamina radio station. Initially envisioned as a critical hub for Germany's transcontinental communication network, Kamina's strategic importance made it a prime target as Allied forces advanced into Togo. The station, which had only recently become operational, found itself at the center of a broader struggle for control over global communication infrastructure.

The destruction of the Kamina radio station was a dramatic and controversial episode in the early months of World War I. Faced with the rapid advance of British and French forces into Togo, German authorities stationed at Kamina were ordered to ensure that this state-of-the-art facility would not fall into enemy hands. On August 24, 1914, after intense deliberation and following direct instructions from Berlin, the German garrison began the systematic dismantling and destruction of the station. Massive antenna masts were toppled, transmitters were dismantled, and key components of the sophisticated equipment were destroyed beyond repair. The operation was overseen by German officers, who understood both the strategic necessity and the symbolic loss that this act entailed.

The decision sparked controversy both within Germany and among observers. While military leaders argued that destroying Kamina was essential to deny the Allies a significant communication advantage, others lamented the obliteration of a facility that represented the pinnacle of technological progress and engineering achievement. Local populations, who had been involved in the station's construction and maintenance, watched as the massive infrastructure was reduced to ruins, leaving behind a mix of awe and despair.

Globally, the destruction of Kamina highlighted the vulnerability of technological assets in times of conflict. It underscored the critical role that communication networks played in modern warfare and foreshadowed the increasing militarization of technology in the 20th century. Despite its brief operational lifespan, Kamina's legacy endures as a testament to the transformative potential of wireless communication and its profound impact on geopolitics.

A Legacy in Ruins

The Kamina radio station, though short-lived, left a profound legacy on the development of global communication technologies. It served as a prototype for transcontinental wireless communication systems, demonstrating the feasibility of transmitting messages across vast distances without reliance on physical cables. This innovation laid the groundwork for the evolution of radio communication, shaping advancements in global connectivity that echo into the present day. In many ways, Kamina was a precursor to the satellite networks and fiber-optic systems that now underpin modern telecommunications.

In Togo, the remnants of Kamina hold cultural and historical significance. The site has become a symbol of the complexities of colonial history, representing both the technological advancements brought by German imperialism and the exploitative labor systems that made such projects possible. For the local population, Kamina's story is a reminder of the intertwined narratives of progress and oppression that define much of colonial history.

Anton Codelli’s role in this story elevates him as a visionary in the broader narrative of technological pioneers. His ability to transform an isolated West African colony into a hub of groundbreaking communication technology highlights his exceptional engineering talent and foresight. Codelli’s work, though deeply rooted in the context of its time, resonates as a precursor to the globalized and interconnected world we inhabit today.

Subscribe now

What if we could design life-saving drugs in days instead of years? Imagine a world where problems currently deemed unsolvable by classical computers could be tackled in a fraction of the time. This is the promise of quantum computing, a revolutionary field that redefines the boundaries of what is computationally possible by leveraging the enigmatic principles of quantum mechanics. Yet, while the potential is immense, the technology is still in its infancy, surrounded by misconceptions and hype. Understanding both its promise and limitations is key to appreciating what quantum computing can truly achieve.

Understanding Quantum Computers: Superposition and Entanglemet

Unlike classical computers, which process information using bits that can only be 0 or 1, quantum computers rely on quantum bits, or qubits, which can represent both 0 and 1 at the same time. Think of it like a coin spinning in the air—instead of being just heads or tails, it exists in a mix of both states until it lands. This unique property allows quantum computers to handle multiple calculations at once, opening up possibilities far beyond the capabilities of classical machines.

But it is important to understand that it’s not merely a matter of ignorance about the state of a qubit. The qubit is genuinely in a state that combines 0 and 1 simultaneously, a phenomenon known as superposition. The impact of a qubit in superposition, being both 0 and 1 at the same time, on other quantum objects is fundamentally different from the impact of a qubit in a definite state of 0 or 1.

The phenomenon of superposition is not due to a lack of knowledge about the qubit's state but rather reflects the unique and intrinsic nature of quantum behavior. It showcases how quantum mechanics fundamentally differs from classical physics, providing a new way of understanding and utilizing the natural world. This state is described with precise mathematical representation through the equations of quantum mechanics, which provide an exact framework for predicting and understanding how qubits behave in time.

To grasp the revolutionary potential of quantum computing, consider the task of locating a single rare book in a massive library. A classical computer operates like a diligent librarian who meticulously checks each book one by one—a reliable but time-consuming process that could take years in a vast library. By contrast, a quantum computer, powered by the phenomenon of superposition, functions like a librarian capable of scanning the indexes of all the books simultaneously, pinpointing the exact location of the desired book significantly faster than classical methods. This extraordinary ability to explore countless possibilities at once underpins the immense power of quantum computing, enabling it to solve complex problems that would be infeasible for classical machines.

Another fundamental property of quantum mechanics that quantum computers leverage is called entanglement. When two qubits become entangled, their states are linked in such a way that the state of one qubit instantly affects the state of the other, no matter how far apart they are. Entangled qubits can themselves exist in a state of superposition, extending the peculiar properties we associate with individual qubits to interconnected systems. This means the "weirdness" of superposition—where a qubit exists in multiple states simultaneously—also applies to entangled qubits, creating even more complex and powerful quantum states that defy classical intuition.

The interconnected nature of entanglement enables quantum computers to execute operations that classical computers cannot. Building on the library analogy, entanglement can be imagined as opening one book and instantly accessing related information from other books across the library, as though they are all linked by an invisible network. This extraordinary capability allows quantum computers to address problems that involve intricate relationships and interdependencies in data, offering transformative solutions to challenges that are beyond the reach of classical computation.

The Building Blocks of Quantum Computation: Quantum Gates and Circuits

In classical computing, the fundamental building blocks of digital circuits are logic gates, which operate on bits—units of information that can be either 0 or 1. These gates perform basic operations such as AND, OR, and NOT. For example, an AND gate outputs 1 only if both its inputs are 1; an OR gate outputs 1 if at least one of its inputs is 1; and a NOT gate inverts its input, turning 0 into 1 and vice versa. These simple yet powerful operations form the basis of all digital computations.

Typically implemented using transistors, logic gates control the flow of electrical signals, producing specific outcomes based on predefined rules. By combining these gates, engineers create more complex circuits, such as processors, which underpin the myriad functions of modern computers. These circuits operate deterministically, adhering to the principles of Boolean algebra, which ensures predictable and reliable outcomes in classical computation.

Quantum computers perform their calculations using quantum gates, which precisely manipulate qubits according to the principles of quantum mechanics. Unlike the logic gates in classical computers, which operate with definitive states of 0 and 1, quantum gates interact with qubits in ways that exploit their quantum properties.

For example, the Hadamard gate is a key operation that places a qubit into a state of superposition, enabling it to represent multiple possibilities simultaneously. This forms the foundation for the parallelism that quantum computing offers. Similarly, the Controlled NOT (CNOT) gate is essential for linking two qubits through entanglement, creating a powerful connection where the state of one qubit instantaneously influences the other, regardless of distance. These gates are critical in enabling quantum computers to perform computations that transcend classical limitations.

These quantum gates serve as the foundational components of quantum circuits, which orchestrate complex sequences of operations on qubits. By leveraging the principles of superposition and entanglement, quantum circuits allow quantum computers to perform computations that transcend the capabilities of classical systems.

Overcoming Fragility: Decoherence and Quantum Error Correction

Building and maintaining quantum computers is an extraordinarily intricate challenge. Unlike classical systems, which have benefited from decades of refinement and optimization, quantum computing remains in its early stages of development. Qubits are exceptionally delicate and highly susceptible to environmental disturbances, which can cause them to lose their quantum properties—a phenomenon known as decoherence.

To mitigate this, quantum computers are designed to operate at extremely low temperatures, close to absolute zero, where the delicate quantum states of qubits can achieve greater stability. These cryogenic environments reduce thermal noise and other disturbances that could disrupt quantum coherence. Despite these stringent measures, scaling up the number of qubits while preserving their stability remains a significant technical challenge.

Unlike classical bits, qubits cannot be directly copied for error checking because the act of copying would collapse their quantum state. Quantum error correction is a sophisticated technique that safeguards quantum information by encoding it across multiple physical qubits to construct a more robust logical qubit. This innovative method enables the detection and correction of errors without the need for direct measurement, thereby preserving the delicate quantum information and ensuring computational reliability.

Recent progress includes experiments suggesting that logical qubits can, under certain conditions, exhibit error rates lower than those of individual physical qubits. While these results are promising, they represent early-stage achievements, with many challenges remaining to ensure consistent and scalable error correction in practical quantum computing. Additionally, researchers have pioneered techniques to perform quantum operations on logical qubits while minimizing the introduction of new errors, further enhancing the feasibility of practical quantum computing. These advancements represent essential strides toward developing quantum computers capable of executing long and accurate computations with unprecedented precision and reliability.

For quantum computers to address real-world, complex problems, they require a significantly larger number of qubits working reliably in unison. However, scaling up from the current tens or hundreds of qubits to the thousands or millions needed presents formidable challenges. As the number of qubits increases, maintaining precise control over them becomes more complex, and the risk of errors grows. Ensuring qubit stability and preventing decoherence—the loss of quantum properties—becomes increasingly difficult in larger systems. Factors such as temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic interference, and even minor vibrations can disrupt qubit states. As a result, advanced techniques like cryogenic shielding, error correction, and noise reduction are critical to sustaining quantum coherence and enabling robust computation at scale.

Overcoming the dual challenges of scalability—increasing the number of qubits—and stability—maintaining coherence among qubits—is pivotal for realizing the full potential of quantum computing. Scalability requires not only adding more qubits but also ensuring that they are interconnected and controlled with high precision, as increasing the qubit count exponentially raises the complexity of the system. Stability, on the other hand, demands advanced error correction techniques, improved materials, and innovations in qubit design to combat decoherence caused by environmental noise and interactions.

Common Misconceptions About Quantum Computing

As quantum computing captures growing attention from the media and the public, numerous misconceptions about its capabilities and potential impact have taken root. Addressing these misunderstandings is critical to offering a balanced and accurate view of what quantum computers are truly capable of achieving and the limitations they inherently possess.

One common misconception is that quantum computers will entirely replace classical computers in all areas of computing. In reality, quantum computers are highly specialized devices designed to tackle specific categories of problems that are either infeasible or prohibitively inefficient for classical systems. Classical computers remain unmatched in their ability to handle general-purpose tasks such as word processing, web browsing, graphic design, and database management. These systems are cost-effective, efficient, and supported by a well-established technological ecosystem refined over decades. By contrast, quantum computers excel in specialized domains like simulating complex quantum systems, solving optimization problems, advancing cryptography, and conducting large-scale simulations. Leveraging the unique properties of quantum mechanics, these machines address problems in ways classical computers cannot replicate. Therefore, quantum computers should be viewed as complementary tools, augmenting classical systems to enhance computational power in specific domains while retaining the broader utility and versatility of classical computing.

Another misconception is that quantum computers are simply faster versions of classical computers. In reality, quantum computers represent an entirely new paradigm of computation, grounded in the principles of quantum mechanics. By exploiting quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement, quantum computers process information in ways that classical computers cannot emulate, regardless of speed. For example, algorithms like Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers and Grover's algorithm for searching unsorted databases demonstrate computational speedups derived directly from quantum mechanical principles. These breakthroughs highlight how quantum computers excel not by sheer speed but by leveraging unique capabilities inherent to quantum systems.

Further common misunderstanding is the belief that quantum computers can solve all problems quickly. While quantum computers provide significant advantages for specific types of problems, they are far from a universal solution for all computational challenges. Quantum computers excel in domains where quantum algorithms offer a clear advantage, such as factoring large numbers (e.g., using Shor's algorithm), simulating quantum systems, and solving certain optimization problems. However, for many other computational tasks, quantum computers provide no known advantage over classical systems and, in some cases, may perform worse due to operational overheads, error rates, and resource constraints. The field of computational complexity demonstrates that not all problems solvable by classical computers benefit from quantum acceleration. Therefore, while quantum computers expand the computational toolkit with unique capabilities, they complement classical systems rather than replace them, and classical algorithms remain indispensable for a vast range of applications.

Some believe that quantum computers are ready for practical use. While rapid advancements have been made, they remain in the developmental stage and are not yet prepared for widespread practical applications. Current quantum devices, known as Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers, operate with a limited number of qubits and face significant challenges such as short coherence times and high error rates due to environmental interference. These issues lead to instability, making it difficult to execute complex algorithms reliably. Quantum error correction techniques, crucial for reducing errors and enhancing computational reliability, are still in development and have not been fully implemented in existing systems. At this stage, quantum computers are primarily used for research, testing quantum algorithms, and advancing our understanding of quantum systems while working toward more robust hardware and scalable solutions.

Another misconception is that building a quantum computer is solely about scaling up the number of qubits. While increasing the qubit count is a necessary step, it alone is far from sufficient for creating practical quantum computers. Factors such as qubit quality, coherence, and error management are equally critical to achieving reliable performance. Simply adding more qubits without improving their fidelity can exacerbate error rates and compromise the system’s overall functionality. As quantum systems grow, maintaining coherence and fidelity across qubits becomes more difficult. Effective quantum error correction—which encodes quantum information across multiple physical qubits to produce stable logical qubits—is essential for scalability. Additionally, advancements in qubit connectivity, precise control systems, innovative cooling technologies, and materials science are crucial. Overcoming these multifaceted engineering challenges is just as important as increasing qubit numbers to ensure the development of functional and scalable quantum computers.

Finally, there is a misconception that quantum computing is solely about speed. While quantum computing can offer significant speed improvements for specific problems, its true potential lies in enabling entirely new capabilities beyond the reach of classical computers. For example, quantum computers excel at simulating quantum systems, providing unprecedented insights into molecular and atomic interactions essential for advancements in drug discovery, materials science, and chemistry. Quantum computing also facilitates the development of groundbreaking cryptographic methods, such as Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), which promises theoretically unbreakable encryption rooted in the principles of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, quantum entanglement enables novel communication protocols, laying the foundation for secure communication networks and the future quantum internet. These transformative capabilities introduce entirely new computational paradigms, offering solutions to challenges once deemed unsolvable, far surpassing the notion of mere speed enhancements.

Understanding the realities of quantum computing is essential for setting realistic expectations and encouraging informed discussions about its transformative potential. Quantum computers hold immense promise as specialized tools for tackling problems that classical computers cannot efficiently solve, from modeling molecular interactions to optimizing complex systems. However, they are not a universal replacement for classical computing. Recognizing their unique strengths, limitations, and current developmental stage enables us to better appreciate their role in the broader computational landscape.

Subscribe now

Picture the human body as a vibrant, bustling city. This city is home to billions of inhabitants—our cells—each with specialized roles. Some act as builders, constructing tissues; others serve as transporters, moving blood and nutrients; while still others maintain order and protect against threats, like the immune system. For all these cells to work seamlessly, they need precise instructions, which are stored in our genes—a vast library brimming with blueprints and detailed recipes for every cellular function.

Every cell in our body carries a complete copy of this vast library, but it doesn't need all the information at once. When a cell needs to create a specific protein, it retrieves the right “recipe” from its library and follows it. However, it's essential that cells don’t mix up the instructions and produce the wrong proteins. This is where microRNA steps in, acting as a smart filter to ensure that only the correct “recipes” are used at the right time.

Tiny Molecules with a Big Impact

MicroRNAs are like tiny but powerful managers in this cellular city. Their job is to control which "recipes" are used and how much they are followed. Imagine microRNAs as sticky notes attached to specific gene “recipes,” providing instructions on whether they should be read, ignored, or adjusted to fine-tune protein production. In some cases, microRNAs completely block gene activity, while in others, they simply dial it down.

This finely tuned control system allows cells to specialize and carry out their unique tasks. For example, muscle cells need different proteins than nerve cells. MicroRNAs make sure that each cell gets the right set of instructions and produces only what it needs. They are also crucial during development, when cells are constantly dividing and becoming specialized. MicroRNAs help steer this process, ensuring that tissues and organs form correctly.

The discovery of microRNAs was a game-changer, unveiling a completely new layer of gene regulation. Until then, scientists knew only a handful of ways to switch genes on or off. MicroRNAs revealed a far more intricate system, introducing previously unknown mechanisms that add complexity and precision to how our genes are controlled.

From Worms to a Genetic Revolution

The discovery of microRNA was the result of persistent research and a fortunate coincidence. In the late 1980s, Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun, both postdoctoral researchers in the lab of Robert Horvitz (the 2002 Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine), were studying genes that control the development of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Ambros focused on the lin-4 gene, whose mutation caused larvae to develop prematurely into adult worms, while Ruvkun studied lin-14, a gene mutation that delayed larval development.

After moving on from their postdoctoral work, Ambros continued his research at Harvard University, where he made a surprising discovery: the lin-4 gene produced a very short RNA molecule that did not encode any protein. This finding was unexpected, as RNA was traditionally seen as a mere messenger, carrying instructions from DNA for protein synthesis.

At the same time, Ruvkun was at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, studying how the lin-14 gene was regulated. He discovered that lin-4 did not stop the production of lin-14 mRNA (messenger RNA, the molecule that transfers genetic instructions from DNA to the cell's protein-making machinery). Instead, it acted at a later stage, during protein synthesis, hinting at a new regulatory role for these tiny RNA molecules.

The Breakthrough Moment

On the evening of June 11, 1992, during a key meeting, Ambros and Ruvkun shared their data and had a breakthrough realization: the short lin-4 RNA sequence matched part of the lin-14 mRNA sequence. This striking discovery led them to hypothesize that lin-4 RNA directly binds to lin-14 mRNA, blocking the production of the LIN-14 protein.

Subsequent research confirmed this hypothesis. Ambros and Ruvkun demonstrated that lin-4 RNA indeed acts as a regulator of the lin-14 gene. Through this discovery, they uncovered a new mechanism of gene regulation mediated by microRNA.

Ambros and Ruvkun's identification of microRNA introduced a completely new type of RNA that plays a vital role in gene regulation. Their work was a milestone, showing that RNA molecules are far more versatile than previously thought. MicroRNAs have proven to be key regulators of gene expression, influencing many biological processes.

MicroRNA in Evolution and Medicine

To date, over a thousand genes encoding various microRNAs have been identified in the human genome. These microRNAs regulate numerous genes, affecting various cellular processes. Some microRNAs have been conserved throughout evolution and are present in a wide range of organisms, while others are unique to specific species, showcasing their adaptability and crucial role in diverse biological processes.

MicroRNAs are small molecules with a significant impact on the body's functioning. They are essential gene regulators and play an important role in the development and operation of our bodies. Their discovery has opened up a new field of research and holds immense potential for the development of new medications.

MicroRNAs are involved in many bodily processes, including immune response and nervous system function. As research continues, scientists are exploring ways to harness microRNAs for therapies. By targeting specific microRNAs, it may become possible to inhibit the growth of cancer cells, reduce inflammation in autoimmune diseases, or promote tissue repair after injury.

A Groundbreaking Discovery Fueled by Curiosity

The revolution in understanding gene function began with the curiosity of two scientists who wanted to comprehend how a tiny worm develops. Ambros and Ruvkun's groundbreaking discovery highlights how basic research driven by curiosity can lead to transformative insights, opening up entirely new avenues for medical innovation and deepening our understanding of life's most fundamental processes.

Subscribe now

The Atlantic Ocean’s circulatory system, which plays a vital role in regulating global climate, faces increasing threats from climate change, with potential consequences for weather patterns and ocean ecosystems. A group of climate scientists recently addressed an open letter to the Nordic Council of Ministers, warning of the high probability of a major disruption in Atlantic ocean circulation. Recent scientific studies indicate that the risk of such a disruption, especially the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), has been significantly underestimated. A collapse of AMOC would bring disastrous and irreversible impacts, particularly for the Nordic countries, but also on a global scale.

AMOC: A Critical Regulator of the Global Climate

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is one of the most important mechanisms in the ocean and climate system, responsible for transporting heat across the Atlantic Ocean. In this process, warm and salty water flows from tropical regions northward, where it cools, becomes denser, and sinks to the ocean floor, traveling back toward the equator. This cycle functions like a global heat conveyor belt, greatly influencing the climate of the North Atlantic region, particularly in Europe and North America. It also impacts other vital climate factors such as weather patterns, precipitation, and marine ecosystems.

However, climate change, especially rising global temperatures and the melting of Arctic ice, is threatening the stability of AMOC. The influx of freshwater from melting ice reduces the salinity and density of seawater, disrupting its ability to sink. If this trend continues, AMOC may slow significantly or even come to a complete halt. This would cause major disruptions in the global climate system, altering the patterns of heat and carbon movement in the oceans.

Catastrophic Consequences for Nordic Countries and the World

A collapse of AMOC would have far-reaching and severe consequences for the Nordic countries and the entire planet. Potential effects include substantial cooling in the Nordic region, as the loss of warm ocean currents would outweigh the warming caused by global climate change. Elsewhere, the effects could be the opposite, with intensified heatwaves, prolonged droughts, and more frequent flooding due to shifts in weather patterns. Changes in precipitation could lead to severe droughts in some areas and increased rainfall in others. Ocean ecosystems, reliant on a stable flow of nutrients and heat, would face severe disruptions, affecting fisheries and the food security of many nations. Additionally, weakened ocean circulation would diminish the ocean’s capacity to absorb carbon dioxide, speeding up atmospheric warming and leading to further ice melt and sea-level rise, especially along the Atlantic coast of the Americas.

In this context, German oceanographer and climatologist Stefan Rahmstorf emphasizes the gravity of the risk:

“A full AMOC collapse would be a massive, planetary-scale disaster. We really want to prevent this from happening. In other words: we are talking about risk analysis and disaster prevention. This is not about being 100% or even just 50% sure that the AMOC will pass its tipping point this century; the issue is that we’d like to be 100% sure that it won’t. That the IPCC only has ‘medium confidence’ that it will not happen this century is anything but reassuring, and the studies discussed here, which came after the 2021 IPCC report, point to a much larger risk than previously thought.”
(Author’s note: In the IPCC’s terminology, “medium confidence” reflects a moderate level of evidence and suggests a roughly 50-66% likelihood, indicating significant uncertainty about the outcome.)
— Rahmstorf, Stefan. “Is the Atlantic Overturning Circulation Approaching a Tipping Point?” Oceanography, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 16–29, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2024.501

Rahmstorf’s stark warning highlights the pressing need for immediate and decisive action to mitigate the risk of AMOC collapse, which could have far-reaching impacts on climate stability. Scientists are urging the Nordic Council of Ministers to take the risk of AMOC collapse seriously and to implement measures without delay. They recommend a comprehensive risk assessment for the region and increased international pressure for swift reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. This is crucial to avoid crossing a temperature threshold that could trigger the collapse of AMOC. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement, remains an essential target.

Clarifying the Difference Between AMOC and the Gulf Stream

It is important to clarify the distinction between AMOC (Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation) and the Gulf Stream, as they are often conflated but represent different aspects of ocean circulation.

The Gulf Stream is a surface ocean current driven primarily by wind and the Coriolis effect (caused by Earth’s rotation). It transports a large volume of water mass along the eastern coast of North America toward Europe, contributing to the transfer of warm water across the Atlantic. However, its role in heat transport is relatively modest when compared to AMOC. The Gulf Stream is largely wind-driven and would not collapse even if AMOC were to slow down or stop.

In contrast, the AMOC is a deep-ocean circulation system that involves both surface and deep currents. It plays a critical role in the climate system by transporting heat from the tropics to the North Atlantic. Unlike the Gulf Stream, AMOC involves density-driven currents, where warm, salty water moves northward at the surface and cooler, denser water sinks and returns southward at depth. This density-driven component is key for heat transport and is sensitive to changes in seawater density, which can be affected by the influx of freshwater from melting ice.

The key difference is that the Gulf Stream mainly transports mass but relatively little heat, while AMOC is crucial for the transport of heat and involves less mass. It is AMOC that plays a vital role in regulating planetary climate by redistributing heat, not the Gulf Stream on its own.

While climate change will not directly halt the Gulf Stream due to its wind-driven nature, a slowdown or collapse of AMOC, caused by reduced seawater density from Arctic ice melt, could disrupt heat transport in the North Atlantic. This would not necessarily stop the Gulf Stream, but it could alter its strength and direction, leading to significant changes in climate, particularly in northern Europe.

AMOC is a vital component of the climate system, and any significant slowdown could have lasting global impacts. The Nordic countries might experience notable cooling, while other regions could face shifts in weather patterns and economic challenges. As global temperatures continue to rise, there is increasing pressure to act swiftly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By taking timely and decisive steps, we can help stabilize this essential part of the ocean’s circulatory system and mitigate potential risks to the global climate.

Subscribe now

"We are made of star stuff." With these simple yet profound words, Carl Sagan—astronomer, writer, and science communicator—invited millions to see themselves as part of the vast universe. As we mark what would have been his 90th birthday on November 9, 2024, it’s a fitting time to reflect on the man who changed how we understand our place in the cosmos. Through the groundbreaking television series Cosmos: A Personal Voyage (1980), scored by the iconic Vangelis, Sagan’s poetic and precise storytelling reached over half a billion viewers—an extraordinary feat for a science program.

In an era when the wonders of the universe often felt out of reach, Sagan’s calm, captivating voice brought the stars closer. Though his life was tragically cut short in 1996 by a rare bone marrow disease, his legacy endures in his books, his television work, and, most profoundly, in the countless minds he inspired to explore the mysteries of existence.

The Wonder of a Curious Mind

Sagan’s immense passion for science and space began in his childhood, as he gazed at the stars from Brooklyn and wondered about their origins. When he first asked his mother how stars were made, she sent him to the library to find a suitable book on the topic. To his surprise, the librarian handed him a book about Hollywood stars, misunderstanding the context of his question. This anecdote, which he often shared later, highlights not only his early interest in astronomy but also the importance of clear communication and understanding context when sharing information.

Because Sagan understood the need to communicate science in a way that would engage and resonate with his audience, he honed a unique talent for making complex scientific concepts accessible and comprehensible. As a young professor of astronomy, he became a regular guest on late-night talk shows, such as The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson. There, he discussed astronomy, space exploration, and the search for extraterrestrial life in an entertaining and understandable way. His appearances were hugely popular, helping to bring science into the mainstream.

Shaped by Family and Scientific Curiosity

Carl Sagan was born in 1934 in Brooklyn, New York, into a family of Jewish immigrants who had left Eastern Europe in search of a better life. His father, Samuel Sagan, worked various jobs to support the family, while his mother, Rachel Molly Gruber, was a homemaker. In many immigrant families of that era, intellectual pursuits were held in high regard, and education was seen as a key to success—a belief that would profoundly shape Sagan’s future.

Rachel, in particular, played a crucial role in nurturing Carl’s curiosity. Known for her sharp mind and ambition, she fostered a love of learning in her son from a young age. Despite the family's modest means, she encouraged him to explore his interests, even allowing him to conduct simple experiments at home. Her unwavering support and encouragement helped lay the foundation for Sagan’s boundless enthusiasm for science and his lifelong quest for knowledge.

The Personal Life of a Public Scientist

After completing his studies in physics and earning a Ph.D. in astronomy, Sagan quickly established himself as a rising star in the scientific community, collaborating with leading researchers across the United States. While his groundbreaking work in planetary science garnered attention, his personal life was equally intertwined with the scientific world.

Early in his career, he married biologist Lynn Margulis, known for her revolutionary theory of endosymbiosis, which explains the origin of eukaryotic cells. Although they shared a passion for science and had two children, their marriage ended relatively soon. Sagan later married twice more, including his final and longest partnership with writer Ann Druyan, who co-created the Cosmos series.

From Venus to the Greenhouse Effect

As a young astronomer in the early 1960s, Sagan hypothesized that the extreme surface temperatures of Venus were due to the greenhouse effect. He suggested that Venus’s thick atmosphere, composed mostly of carbon dioxide, trapped heat and led to the planet's scorching temperatures. This hypothesis was later confirmed by a space probe sent to Venus.

Sagan’s idea highlighted the importance of the greenhouse effect in shaping planetary climates and spurred research into the impact of greenhouse gases on Earth. He warned that unchecked increases in greenhouse gases on our planet could lead to a similar outcome as seen on Venus, with potentially catastrophic consequences for Earth.

In December 1985, Sagan testified before the U.S. Congress about the greenhouse effect and its potential impact on Earth’s climate. He emphasized that rising greenhouse gas concentrations could lead to global warming and climate change. He urged timely action, cautioning that failure to address the issue could create severe problems for future generations.

The Pale Blue Dot: A Vision for Humanity

Sagan participated in numerous NASA missions, including the Mariner, Viking, and Voyager probes. His vision led to the creation of the "Golden Record," a message to potential extraterrestrial civilizations carried aboard the Voyager spacecraft, containing sounds and images from Earth. One of his most notable achievements was the "Pale Blue Dot" photograph, which shows Earth as a tiny speck in the vastness of space.

As early as 1981, Sagan suggested that Voyager 1, once far enough from Earth, should turn its camera back to take a photograph of our planet. Initially, the idea faced strong opposition, as many experts deemed the photo unnecessary since Earth was already well-documented. Nevertheless, Sagan persisted, understanding the profound significance such an image could hold for humanity.

On February 14, 1990, when Voyager was already 6 billion kilometers away from Earth, the probe received the command to turn and take a "family portrait" of the Solar System. The resulting image shows Earth as nothing more than a faint blue dot. Sagan famously wrote about this photograph: “Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it, everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you’ve ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.” The photograph has become a symbol of our place in the universe and a reminder of how precious our planet is.

Communicating Science with Heart and Precision

Sagan had a unique ability to present science in a way that was neither overly academic nor strictly technical, a pioneering approach at the time that has since become more widely accepted. His emotional connection to knowledge and enthusiasm for scientific discovery were key in sparking public interest. Such an approach is often a prerequisite for effectively conveying the significance and meaning of science.

In his television series Cosmos, Sagan employed a narrative style that took viewers on a journey through space and time. Rather than presenting dry facts, he used metaphors and storytelling to make complex scientific concepts accessible to a broad audience. For instance, he illustrated the age of the universe using the "cosmic calendar," compressing the entire history of the universe into a single year, effectively conveying vast timescales.

The Sagan Effect: The Price of Popularizing Science

Remembering Sagan also brings to mind the so-called "Sagan Effect," which refers to the phenomenon where scientists active in popularizing science face criticism or a diminished reputation within the academic community. The perception is that dedicating time and effort to communicating science to the public detracts from their seriousness or commitment to "real" science. Sagan himself faced many criticisms for his public outreach; he was denied tenure at Harvard and was not elected to the National Academy of Sciences, leading to this effect being named after him.

Today, the “Sagan Effect” has taken on a new dimension. While some still view public outreach with skepticism, the legacy of scientists like Sagan has paved the way for a new generation of science communicators who recognize that engaging the public is an essential part of the scientific mission.

In an era when the future of our planet seems uncertain, Sagan's message remains as relevant as ever: We are all stewards of this tiny, fragile world, and it is up to us to protect our shared home. As we continue to explore the cosmos and grapple with the challenges facing our planet, Sagan’s words remind us of our shared humanity and the fragile beauty of the only home we’ve ever known.

Subscribe now